12月7日 －－ S1A ＋ S1B ＋ 特見(他終於康復了)

原帖由 hp7629 於 2006-12-8 02:14 發表
According to the complain, I think that the photoes of KMB AMN1 cannot be posted anymore on board B3 because the boardmate does not like anyone to post these photoes.

Therefore, it is not lega ...

雖然有些人的確係怕被人影到相,但反應又未
大到要投訴咁嚴重,學老前輩話齋,當你越刻意
去避,就更加引人注目,結果越搞越大

做人要懂得放鬆,事事都要拉緊,只會令自己受
到無謂既壓力,最終受傷係自己,無謂為一張半
張相又要整篇長文

原帖由 teddybus 於 2006-12-8 03:31 發表


本人亦懷疑閣下指當事人向閣下表示不滿一事的真確性
除非閣下能提供足夠證明
否則 本人有權保留對閣下言論追究的權利

他昨天晚上親自致電本人表示不滿.

原帖由 edhong 於 2006-12-8 00:13 發表


you are wrong this time ! why he doesn't complain himself, complain by others is not acceptable in here (ah, he also has account wor ~~~)

他自己本人亦已向版主投訴.(昨天他在電話中親口說的)

原帖由 eric278 於 2006-12-8 07:00 發表

他自己本人亦已向版主投訴.(昨天他在電話中親口說的)

似乎版主應該證實一下有無咁的事了．無理由首相去做AMN1的代言人

According to boardmate eric278, boardmate AMN1 states that he is angry about posting any photo of KMB AMN1.  Not only boardmate eric278, but also boardmate AMN1 boardmate oneself complain the event of posting the photoes of KMB AMN1.

The story started in late November, after boardmate AMN1 had sent to be hospital when he had accident, he worked in Airport.  See also boards A15 and B3 (one should find the topic in the next pages.).  After I read these 2 discussion topics, I discovered that boardmate AMN1 does not want everyone to post photoes on board B3 anymore.

Even though my thinking may have something wrong, in my limited understanding, boardmate AMN1 has been angry about the posting the photoes since he was sent to hospital after the accident.  However, this is nothing wrong before the accident happened.
Therefore, I hope that boardmates eric278 or AMN1 can provide more information.

原帖由 eric278 於 2006-12-8 06:58 發表

他昨天晚上親自致電本人表示不滿.

原帖由 hp7629 於 2006-12-8 09:01 發表
According to boardmate eric278, boardmate AMN1 states that he is angry about posting any photo of KMB AMN1.  Not only boardmate eric278, but also boardmate AMN1 boardmate oneself complain the eve ...

It is the same question: I dont see any strong evidence that he had complained to the board head. Therefore,  I think it is better for him to complain PUBLICLY or at least write down something here. Complaining secretly without notifying those involved is not recommended.

本人是收到站友AMN1兩封投訴iMsg後才發出注意文章，符合有關站規的要求。

我不介意站友未經證實便懷疑本人的辦事方法，但各位須經站長信箱作出投訴

原帖由 admin22 於 2006-12-8 09:12 發表
本人是收到站友AMN1兩封投訴iMsg後才發出注意文章，符合有關站規的要求。

我不介意站友未經證實便懷疑本人的辦事方法，但各位須經站長信箱作出投訴

OK THAT'S FINE IF YOU SAY SO....
I HAVE NO OBJECTION.....

回題:
病好返就應該返屋企療養啦
仲走去山卡罅咁遠　

[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2006-12-8 09:22 編輯 ]

原帖由 orange 於 2006-12-8 01:11 發表

板主,根據現時本港私隱條並無肖像權,而且相片
只是展示一位乘客在公眾地方等車,加上相片上
有多過一個人存在,請問板主你指板友侵犯了那
人的私隱?

睇番本板板規只係不可公開任何個人資料,但投訴
需由當 ...

照你咁講, 即係貼肥X張相出來係合情合理合法啦, RIGHT?

  DELETED

其實n281都係做好心, 俾大家知肥X識行識走, 等大家唔駛為佢擔心

[ 本帖最後由 lok1032 於 2006-12-8 15:20 編輯 ]

原帖由 Crotone 於 2006-12-8 08:44 發表

似乎版主應該證實一下有無咁的事了．無理由首相去做AMN1的代言人

一向都係咁
http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/ ... &extra=page%3D1
http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/ ... &extra=page%3D1

比如容小姐有事, 霍文希出來交代下咁

我唔覺得有咩問題