新巴服務 日日退步 (歡迎接龍)

原帖由 GK9636 於 2007-1-4 15:23 發表

Yeah, complaining to mass media and councillors seem to be more relevant and feasible than complaining to those troublemakers. But I do see the government always neglecting people's needs. Therefore, I suggest complaining to councillors as they are powerful enough. However, at the same time, I do think finding other substitutions or waking up earlier would be the other method that the one involved should do to avoid continuing waiting at bus stop and seeing several full load buses skipping the stop every day. It would be more meaningful. Struggling for better service costs time and would not be easy. In my case, I simply do both .

I understand your viewpoint, and I agree that finding other substitutions or waking up early is the only method in this moment. However, does it mean that the passager should bear the consequences that getting up early because of just a cutting in frequences of bus services?? I dont think so. As least you agree that the bus companies should be responsible to provide the suitable and frequent service to passagers, and it is just the government chooses to ignore the situation, but there are some guys stating that the bus companies has no responsibility to provide such service and our concern is all nonsense. I really feel angry about such a irrational response. Actually, the writer also claim that he chooses other substitute to travel, but does it mean what the bus company does is correct, and can not be justified?????

If you also choose to do both, why did you criticize on me of making complains before????

原帖由 teddybus 於 2007-1-4 16:34 發表


I understand your viewpoint, and I agree that finding other substitutions or waking up early is the only method in this moment. However, does it mean that the passager should bear the consequ ...

No, I haven't criticized your actions. Maybe I need to clarify clearly. I only think complaining to TD and bus companies is meaningless at the moment. Actually, I have also encountered those situations that some boardmates have mentioned and I really understand their feelings. Yeah, if the bus companies try to improve the service, it would be an optimum solution. But what I am saying is I still doubt the effort and sincerity of those troublemakers in terms of improving the service. So that's why I only tell the cruel fact and express regret with those rubbish policies.

原帖由 GK9636 於 2007-1-4 16:57 發表


No, I haven't criticized your actions. Maybe I need to clarify clearly. I only think complaining to TD and bus companies is meaningless at the moment. Actually, I have also encountered those situations that some boardmates have mentioned and I really understand their feelings. Yeah, if the bus companies try to improve the service, it would be an optimum solution. But what I am saying is I still doubt the effort and sincerity of those troublemakers in terms of improving the service. So that's why I only tell the cruel fact and express regret with those rubbish policies.

I would like to ask: does it mean that the complain is inappropriate if some people think that it is useless??? Obviously it is the fault of troublemakers to ignore the fact, but does it mean we just accept their ignorance, and make a amendment with the situation not caused by us???? I dont think it is a suitable act. Of course it may be useless to send more and more complains to the troublemakers, but at least we have done something to express our anger. I really disagree with some guys stating that refusing to the route can show our anger. How will they know our anger??? They may just think that: Oh, less people needs the route, why dont we further cut the frequence?! Is it the result you would like to see? If yes, sorry, we are not in same channel and I have nothing to justify.

原帖由 teddybus 於 2007-1-4 17:14 發表

I would like to ask: does it mean that the complain is inappropriate if some people think that it is useless??? Obviously it is the fault of troublemakers to ignore the fact, but does it mean we just accept their ignorance, and make a amendment with the situation not caused by us???? I dont think it is a suitable act. Of course it may be useless to send more and more complains to the troublemakers, but at least we have done something to express our anger. I really disagree with some guys stating that refusing to the route can show our anger. How will they know our anger??? They may just think that: Oh, less people needs the route, why dont we further cut the frequence?! Is it the result you would like to see? If yes, sorry, we are not in same channel and I have nothing to justify.

Yeah, complaint is to express my anger. But the rubbish replies make me angrier. Maybe that's my personal problems and the cost of further complaining for me would be too high. I finally give up.  I appreciate your concrete faith. Good luck

原帖由 alexero 於 2007-1-4 14:17 發表
少少回應

1. 點解我要搭682，因為呢條線實在快
由上車到落車，只需20分鐘，計埋行路去巴士站，都只係30分鐘
如果搭巴士(82P/83X)轉地鐵，唔計等車都要45-50分鐘
兩者相差15分鐘，早晚來回就慳30分鐘
如果 ...

alexro 兄,
樓上咁多位版友o既回應,
真係"大膽"到巴士公司都唔敢用

如無意外, 明早清晨又係要入TKO, 今次應該會好早返出來,
睇下明早682又攪D乜出來先.....

我提議將條片寄去亞視的第一手真相,
再把上次b2的版友投訴, 真人真事的link俾佢地,
加上運吉同新記的電郵回覆,
用傳媒力量, 反映事實!

今日低部車之後去左數682..今日真係過癮好多,
相信板友應該易左上車...以下係今日觀察所得....

全部都係在小瀝源路右轉大老山隧道觀察:

8:15a.m., 1220 "沙甸魚"式頂閘,
8:20a.m., 3022 頂閘
8:22a.m., 1082 企到出門口
8:24a.m., 5084 9成坐位滿座, 冇人企
8:32a.m., 1066 企到出門口
8:35a.m., 5088"沙甸魚"式頂閘
8:40a.m., 5069 企到出門口
8:52a.m., 5019 "沙甸魚"式頂閘
9:00a.m., 1218 企到黃線
9:07a.m., 5103 8成半滿座, 有位剩

比對之前小弟係2號數682....

原帖由 hkbw 於 2007-1-2 09:46 發表
今早老早出左去將軍澳做點事, 做完返左MOS食早餐之後, 就無聊出左去睇下682
的班次及客量係咪真係咁唔合比例...

小弟見的第一班682係1077, 8:11a.m.由小瀝源路右轉去大老山隧道, 已經係頂閘,
俾唔俾人上都好視乎個司機...之後8:11a.m.至8:25a.m. 就有兩班都係近乎頂閘的682
駛經同一位置, 係大老山上唔上人亦都係視乎司機做法.

8:27a.m., 3006就到達第一城單車公園對開的分站, 當時部車d乘客已經係企到門口,
看來上埋九巴廠對出的分站, 大老山的乘客都未必上到車, 和之前的幾班682差唔多情況.

8:34a.m., 1216到達第一城單車公園對開的分站, 呢班車比3006更加多人, 應該都停唔到
大老山隧道的分站的了.

8:35a.m., 3026緊隨1216到達第一城單車公園對開的分站, 呢班人數冇1216咁多, 因為都係
跟著1216, 但都要企到接近司機位...大老山的乘客好彩, 而司機又好人既話, 應該上到車...

之後就真係離晒大譜, 要到8:51.a.m., 1213才到達第一城單車公園對開的分站, 只有部分乘客
上到車, 頂閘情況係頂點, 沙甸魚咁, 多一個人也容不下...

9:01.a.m., 5083到達第一城單車公園對開的分站, 呢班就好好多, 只係中門附近有人企, 上埋九巴廠
對出的分站, 都仲有位, 剛好夠係大老山上返十幾個客吧...

照咁睇, 看來應該係3026及1213中間加多部車會好d...

題外話, 680A及680客量都係一時時, 有D班次來到仲有位坐, 有D直頭要飛站, 個
差別都幾大....

今日多左一班車...不過d時間都得唔係太好, 有d班次都係爆到九彩, 有d班次就
仲有位坐...

呢兩日數車, 小弟都有影相, 遲d整理好後再另開新post 貼相...

歡迎討論

[ 本帖最後由 hkbw 於 2007-1-7 00:11 編輯 ]

原帖由 hkbw 於 2007-1-5 09:41 發表
今日低部車之後去左數682..今日真係過癮好多,
相信板友應該易左上車...以下係今日觀察所得....

全部都係在小瀝源路右轉大老山隧道觀察:

8:15a.m., 1220 "沙甸魚"式頂閘,
8:20a.m., 3022 頂 ...

看來682已加了班，未知是否回復了原有的班次呢？
希望有關情況可以維持啦