[Sun News]首件免費 下周二實行, 英航按件徵寄艙行李費
[複製鏈接]
|
廉價航空限一件寄倉就話無厚非,
英航禁學法, 佢同廉價航空咪只差有無飛機餐既分別
一早訂了飛搭BA d乘客肯定最慘, 無得以此理由"回水"之餘只能買過巨型喼去旅行 |
|
世界火車/巴士站巡禮2015 復活
|
|
|
Cannot help it... Since BA changed its CEO... The new CEO just love cutting things and all he cares is to maximise profit...
Before they cut the benefit and condition for many of their staff... And they only stopped as the crew threaten then that they will go on strike...
And now finally it comes to passengers turn... BA services is not pretically well already... And now reducing baggage allowance will just give more passenger to its competitor...
For London-Hong Kong for instance, we have CX/VS who will happily let you check in more than 1 baggage and to have 32kg maximum... Compare to BA 23kg maximum and 1 baggage only...
This really will bring BA a pretty good profit or revenue in the short-term... But god knows what is going to happen in long-term when passenger know that they can get a VS ticket for same price but to have 25~32kg of baggage allowance and no limitation on how many check-in item... I am sure many will be happy to shift to BA competitors... |
|
|
|
|
真的嗎?你的看法是與阿特蘭大比較還是什麼?
不要忘記LHR比其他歐洲主要國際機場來得細,航班也十分緊張。
請參考ACI的數據再作評論,LHR是全球第三繁忙的機場,去年有6700萬人次使用,吞吐量已經不算太高??
LHR除左係一個終點站,也是一個中轉站,不要少看這個問題。英航咁樣做,唔係減少貨物重量 (因為計算貨物係以重量計),而係減少數量,提高效率之餘也減輕行李處理的壓力。
補充一點,Productivity跟英國機場吞吐量的關係不大,還要看機場本身的capacity,T5雖然可以提高更大空間,但沒有第三條跑道去支持,飛機擠塞等問題都是阻止LHR本身的發展,尤其是近兩年LHR的增長率少於0.8%就是最佳例子,因為飽和問題T5再申請planning permission也是正確的。
[ 本帖最後由 norrislaw 於 2007-2-11 05:41 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
回覆 #4 norrislaw 的帖子
的確係..我住atl..經常用atl去sfo..jfk等地..上個月去過坐英航去LHR..
人流同飛機升降唔似比ATL黎得密...同JFK有得比.. |
|
CO1151@73Y>CO99@772ER>
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|