昂坪360晚上有吊車墮下無人受傷

原帖由 ArnoldC 於 2007-6-12 18:13 發表



英國舊年發生過啦!

仲要兩架載滿人相撞後跌落來


唔好以為外國一定勁,
香港一定廢至得ga!!!

u know
fools are everywhere

原帖由 alexero 於 2007-6-11 22:21 發表
咁易跌架吊車落黎，會死人架...
你幾時聽過外國有吊車會跌落黎？ ...

Do more research before posting any potentially misleading information

原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 18:57 發表



u know
fools are everywhere

咁大家個standard都唔同, 正如倫敦地鐵的common practice, 係香港絕對係不能接受...
以香港既standard來講, 今次真係好大鑊的了

寬己嚴人, 呢個先係做生意做人處世之道..

咁其他國家的media, 想點寫咪點寫law, 最緊要做好自己先, 咁就唔會俾人話啦..
你幾可見香港的集體運輸系統為外國人垢病!?

事件反而間接證明，香港海洋公園的吊車系統，無論在運作、管理和維修，比昂坪360較為優勝。

原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 18:54 發表



Bullshit Aussies!!
How about themselves??

Is it ok to use the bold word? Even though it is so-called commonly-used in overseas.

By the way, as you have mentioned, they are wholly satisfied with the railway system in their own country, so it is doubtless they won't report the accident existed in their own system as what you said. Maybe they are so interested on that there are some places getting more troublemsome and serious accident.

話時話, 想問一問, 過往有冇案例試過好似今次np360咁, 跌部吊車落街跌到咁"一絲不掛"呢?!

empty

[ 本帖最後由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 19:26 編輯 ]

政府常常保障鐵路的利益,cut嶼巴班次,
,結果保到最後又是得個吉 ,
現在只得巴士走去昂坪,
唉.... .

原帖由 Eddie 於 2007-6-11 22:51 發表

我聽過係因為直昇機趺左d野落去纜車度出事
無啦啦跌落黎真係冇乜印象
今次香港形象大受打擊
如果政府係有d用o既就即刻終止skyrail o既管理合約再要佢賠償損失 ...

HK media rarely report scandals of "western advanced nations".


"Australians don't wash their hands."
HK people response: "Because they are so clean that they don't have to wash their hands."

HK people common perception: Because it's good, so it's good

[ 本帖最後由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 19:34 編輯 ]

原帖由 daiteioh 於 2007-6-12 19:17 發表
政府常常保障鐵路的利益,cut嶼巴班次,
,結果保到最後又是得個吉 ,
現在只得巴士走去昂坪,
唉.... .

可以收歛你的態度嘛 ?
大吉利是 如果是架23羌山墜坡, 你會怎回應?

[ 本帖最後由 guia 於 2007-6-12 19:26 編輯 ]