昂坪360晚上有吊車墮下無人受傷

原帖由 sunnykam 於 2007-6-12 00:34 發表
真係好彩架車冇人, 大陸d野化學極都唔會成架纜車跌落黎...

OT: 有d版友話澳洲d鐵路麻麻地, 其實skyrail 0係當地嘅reputation又點? 澳洲版友點睇?

澳洲鐵路麻麻地(not that great)?? Are u kidding??

Australian railways are mostly in risky condition.
Derailments and train crashes are so normal that they are usually NOT reported to the public.

Unlike Hong Kong's spoiled citizens, Australians are satisfied with their rail service

[ 本帖最後由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 10:04 編輯 ]

原帖由 2157 於 2007-6-12 07:33 發表

另外，如果照新聞報o既時間大約為20:20的話，在博覽會開20:02
之E22班次好大機會會見到昨晚的突發情況。想起都有點兒害怕。

咁0既話呢位師傅真係好彩囉.......如果架吊車跌
歪小小，而佢又踩快 D 的話，部躉隨時窄扁都
有知......

同埋睇0下今次地鐵會唔會因為呢單杰0野而怒
炒 Skyrail......

原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2007-6-12 09:45 發表



澳洲鐵路麻麻地(not that great)?? Are u kidding??

Australian railways are mostly in risky condition.
Derailments and train crashes are so normal that they are usually NOT reported to the public.

U ...

Australians are satisfied with their rail service = The rail service is definitely safe?

原帖由 teddybus 於 2007-6-12 10:39 發表


Australians are satisfied with their rail service = The rail service is definitely safe?

They are satisfied with the unsafe service.

Usually after a rail disaster, nothing will be done by the government and people still take the train as usual

原帖由 053h4 於 2007-6-12 10:24 發表


閣下言論是指墨爾本還是整個澳洲?

Except Perth

The most risky system is Sydney (New South Wales), then followed by Melbourne (Victoria)

Train drivers sometimes have to slow down the train themselves because the tracks are in such a worst condition that the track distortion is visible

the service quality of Queensland Rail in Brisbane is not bad,

although a lack of frequency yet does not meet the growing demand.

delay on weekends is often experienced due to road track maintainance.

(陰謀論,並冇事實根據)
會唔會係嶼巴唔扺得昂坪360搶曬生意,請人報復整跌架吊車落來等佢冇得做,然後嶼巴再次獨市?

其實係外國, 多唔多類似 "昂坪360" 的呢一類中長途(吊運式)纜車呢?

原帖由 AVW56 於 2007-6-12 12:49 發表
其實係外國, 多唔多類似 "昂坪360" 的呢一類中長途(吊運式)纜車呢?

瑞士有