hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

 找回密碼
 會員申請加入


(B0)香港巴士車務及車廂設備 (B1)香港巴士廣告消息/廣告車行踪 (B2)香港巴士討論 [熱門] [精華] (B3)巴士攝影作品貼圖區 [熱門] [精華] (B3i)即拍即貼 -手機相&翻拍Mon相 (B4)兩岸三地巴士討論 [精華] (B5)外地巴士討論 [精華]

Advertisement


(B6)旅遊巴士及過境巴士 [精華] (B7)巴士特別所見 (B11)巴士精華區 (B22)巴士迷吹水區   (V)私家車,商用車,政府及特種車輛 [精華]
(A6)相片及短片分享/攝影技術 (A10)香港地方討論 [精華] (A11)消費著數及飲食資訊 (A16)建築物機電裝置及設備 (A19)問路專區 (N)其他討論題目  
(F1)交通路線建議 (C2)航空 [精華] (C3)海上交通及船隻 [精華] (D1)公共交通有關商品 [精華]   (Y)hkitalk.net會員福利部 (Z)站務資源中心
(R1)香港鐵路 [精華] (R2)香港電車 [精華] (R3)港外鐵路 [精華]   (O1)omsi討論區 (O2)omsi下載區 (O3)omsi教學及求助區
(M1)小型巴士綜合討論 (M2)小型巴士多媒體分享區 (M3)香港小型巴士字軌表        
 

Advertisement

 

hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網»論壇 (B) Bus 巴士討論區 香港巴士討論 (B2) 昨天元朗西鐵站發現(與B1有關)
開啟左側

[經歷分享/報告] 昨天元朗西鐵站發現(與B1有關)

[複製鏈接]
307 發表於 2007-7-13 11:45 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 FBI2 於 2007-7-12 13:10 發表
It is only like a trap, but actually it's not a trap. It depends on different boardmates.
DA54 doubted why he asked the thing what he knew. It can be a question, it can
also be a trap. However, DA54 was not talking about the issue of eric278's website.
Then, eric278 started to talk about his website's issue here which violated
rule 24. That's why I said it is like a trap.

My feeling is: eric278 is very unlucky cos he felt into a possible trap carelessly. However,
he really violated rule 24.

To prevent the further problem, I deleted what I said about "trap". I aplogise for any
inconvenient caused. VERY SORRY TO ALL INCLUDING 307 AND DA54.


I don't quite agree with your analysis here.
I would not say that it's a trap at all since the source of the problem here came from what eric278 said at the start.
He started a thread trying to hint if anyone knew when would the route B1 start,
but then as pointed out by DA54, he knew "the answer" himself and seemed to be showing off instead of simply asking a question.

And what later took place were the misinterpretation on the part of eric278,
kept on saying what was said in his website and how he came to knowledge of "the answer".

Of course, he must be held responsible for getting the thread involved with his own website,
but he should also be held liable for releasing some "false information".
Nobody here asked him to release any information that he knew at the first place,
but once he decided to release, he should be responsible for making sure what he said was real,
and to notify others if what he said was "false".
He was irresponsible in that respect, and I guess this is why he should be held liable.

On the other hand, whether he is malicious is another question here,
and I don't think this would affect whether he should be liable for what he had done as an act,
rather it's only a factor that the broadmaster might wish to consider when it comes to "sentencing"
.

I don't agree on your "trap" analysis, even though you had already taken the words away,
which I appreciated very much.
只罵不建議=不負責任
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請加入

本版積分規則

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

站規|清理本站Cookies|hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

GMT+8, 2025-5-2 07:37

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表