[綜合討論] 在1.25生效的搭巴士要扣安全帶

s3n370 發表於 2026-1-25 05:23
雙層巴士就真係無乜幾多位唔係高危。

單層、旅遊巴甚至AMN猛獅再世就唔同講法。 ...

我覺得單層有企位既巴士唔使帶安全帶，係旅遊巴先要
因係歐洲小巴及旅巴係必須要帶安全帶，但公共巴士又唔使帶，但歐洲大部份巴士係單層
參考：
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/leg ... f-safety-belts.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/transit/s/wA77QkOCjJ

如果香港因以往上層因開罐頭而拋出車外，而規定剩係上層要帶可以理解
特別上層車頭前排坐椅已經規定要有安全帶，唔差在立法規定帶安全帶
問題而家全車要帶安全帶太擾民，應該改為規定坐上層車頭前排一定要帶定全上層要帶？

城巴今日成堆車都有貼黃色提示戴安全帶

AVCBWU469 發表於 2026-1-24 23:05
講真反車呢啲嘢
E.g.88K反車意外嗰啲連普通道路都反
唔係應該要檢討係咪司機駕駛態度問題定係根本唔夠休 ...

因為重覆發生兼再一次死人
呢個世界就係咁
錯一次補鑊
但之後發現又錯
即係原有補救措施未達成效

AD118 發表於 2026-1-24 23:15
我覺得單層有企位既巴士唔使帶安全帶，係旅遊巴先要
因係歐洲小巴及旅巴係必須要帶安全帶，但公共巴士又 ...

你引嘅第一份EU directive已經講佐戴安全帶係強制。

//The obligation to use the safety belt when the vehicle is in motion is extended to all categories of vehicles and to all seats fitted with one (Directive 2003/20/EC). It related initially only to vehicles of less than 3.5 tonnes fitted with restraint systems and, for certain vehicles (coaches, light goods vehicles), did not apply to the back seats (Directive 91/671/EEC).//

雖然隔一段講佐可以適度豁免，你可以睇番#73引嘅例子，
只係豁免urban bus安裝。但若果架車有安裝，乘客就一定要戴。
英國國會文件甚至講明若果戴安全帶俾豁免，反而會易混淆及有漏洞。
//Certain exemptions may be granted, particularly in order to allow certain professional activities to be carried out efficiently, to ensure the proper functioning of activities relating to law-and-order, safety or emergency services, or to take account of the special conditions in certain types of transport.//

雖然urban bus一般無裝安全帶，#73及#74有一D有安全帶嘅urban bus嘅例子。

ccchhhuuunnn 發表於 2026-1-25 04:54
不過如果照你咁講
下層扣埋高危座位真係冇乜幾多個位剩
又會變咗不如全車標配算數

全車座位仲好啦，P960/P968化