減少對大埔公路沙田段嘅依賴都係其中一個目的
呢條路嘅設計，旨在西岸有條類似東岸車公廟路同大涌橋路嘅非幹綫主幹道
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
咁啲車去東岸行大涌橋咪得？東岸西岸之間有啲咩困難唔可以過對岸？
|
|
|
IG: mhlam307_spotting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
睇完只可以講笑死！T4起完，希爾頓入沙田方向會有新增車流！同時獅子橋過新城市，兩個入口倒車落塞沙市圈！起多條繞道未直係塞爆沙市圈。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
本帖最後由 noname617 於 2026-9-24 08:50 編輯
MK01 發表於 2026-9-23 22:58
點解要過兩次河？我指嘅大圍係四美、銅鑼灣村同大圍道一帶喎
大埔公路未有個積運街出口囉！想問點去唔到啊？
你要減少依賴埔公係學其他師兄講，直接污水處理廠過t6橋，石門出行地面大涌橋路或者經沙田路去到紅梅谷出，及未來的t4新沙市出口，唔係盲目在繁忙的源禾路搞擴闊同係沙田公園掘隧道或加建行車橋。
另外提一提你掘隧道或打行車橋樁仲要避近年興建的蓄洪池，有機會要掘更深避左個池，但凡是地下有個儲水池應該唔會放隧道係佢下邊，因為用得耐個池防水失效會漏水。
所以你搞一搞成個沙田的城市規劃變動曬！用心睇下人地新城市鎮規劃啦！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
本帖最後由 MK01 於 2026-9-24 11:27 編輯
唔係掘隧道，亦都唔係天橋，條路係地面道路，起完會縮減沙田公園範圍
而我上文講嘅，係希望由大圍出發去火炭同未來污水處理廠新發展區嘅車改用呢條新路去，減少原有道路嘅流量
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Not least was the fact that, as mentioned, Sha Tin was the gateway to the New Territories and had to accommodate large through routes for traffic not connected to the town. One particular conflict was at the planned town centre. This was next to the railway station but separated from it by the trunk road. It was feared that impatient drivers might try to use the centre as a rat run to avoid delays at road junctions. This was overcome by making the town centre's roads rather tortuous; they certainly aren't going to save anyone any time. Sounds strange, but it works well." (Garrett, 2015, p. 122)
唔知係咪你所講嘅段落
Garrett, R. J. (2015). Sha Tin — The Building of a New Town. Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 55, 115–133. https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/db790g05b |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
你只係減少左係市中心個圈嘅車流量
大埔道同源禾路無擴充過個容量
又點做到分流
CTS-3有研究過由大圍去到落路下嘅沙田繞道
呢種設計先叫真正分流
沙田公園絕對係整個沙田嘅landmark
無咩誘因為左「分流」好地地去搞個公園
唔知係唔係已經移風易俗咗
發展真係變成左硬道理
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
其實成個市中心區最大問題就係新城市商場個停車場，只要有方法禁止排太長嘅隊阻塞公家路，或者將執法或舉證嘅門檻調低，就可以令條隊消失，大會堂巴士站就唔會再咁塞 |
|
|
鴨免：包容協助能力稍遜的板友
|
|
|
|
|
|
咁起多條路，都可以將路過沙田市中心唔入新城市嘅車改行新路，從而改善擠塞情況
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
問題在於係咪塞到要剷左半個公園去再induce demand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
