運輸處改例..唔比再用HID

http://www.td.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_1178/hid_requirement_chi.pdf

我都幾鐘意用HID..鐘意佢係白光...
不過改左例之後..就要拆喇..要用返普通白光膽

其實不嬲都唔比，不過有幾單交通意外係因為受對頭車HID燈角度影響，運吉再出通告提醒o者

我都唔明點解唔比HID...
有時落雨用HID真係睇得清楚D!

原廠有就用得,即係焗住番廠買?
定係叫人換車?

其實有太多自行後期改裝0既HID係路面亂咁照，都唔係照路，係照人

只要閣下能搵到車房改到符合國際規定，又過到TD，咪可以用HID

所以原厰HID車頭燈都仲可以用，即係唔一定俾人自己鐘意裝乜就去買。

原因係原裝非HID的燈罩燈光折射設計並唔適合HID，反射出黎的光線會令到對面線&前面的人視覺受好大的影響
反射出黎的光線有機會高達4米，所以對其他路面使用者好大影響

點解要去禁HID而唔去捉有問題燈影?
斬腳趾避沙蟲

原帖由 tokifung 於 2007-11-3 22:39 發表
點解要去禁HID而唔去捉有問題燈影?
斬腳趾避沙蟲

試問又捉得幾多？
禁止非原廠使用HID的車使用HID，
我認為這是一個一了百了的做法

其實我自己好怕比d HID 燈o既車跟住, 因為比佢地射住, 對眼真係好辛苦.

要管制o既, 就要管制返射出黎d 光o既角度.

This is just one thing I dun get about HK government or HK drivers, in the US, we ahve alot of ppl used HID (Converted once), however, most ppl will only use 6000K and 8000K, and after installing it, we will adjust the beam pattern so that we will not place glare to on coming cars, this is standard procedure (however, DOT version lights cannot adjusted sideways, only up and down)  and so far in Seattle, i saw every car with HID adjusted.  I think rather then banning it, they should require documentation from car owners after they changed over to HID that they have readjusted the headlight (my 2 Mercedes, a c 230 Coupe, and a E 320 Wagon, both got HID and both went to the dealer to readjusted with no cost).