[24/11/07]炒頭短蘭-208

部車今日已經復出行606，城巴真係快手！

In #5, Boardmate Susan who is not the boardmaster states that the Citybus #208 will be retired.  However, the statement #21 has disproven the statement #5 what has been said.

P.S.1. Definition:
The boardmaster represents the boardmate who writes the first essay (#1).  In this case, Boardmate ad63 is the boardmaster of this discussion, not Boardmate Susan.


P.S.2.
The essay #5 can be reported if someone thinks that there may be suspension to break the rule.

原帖由 hp7629 於 2007-11-28 12:50 發表
In #5, Boardmate Susan who is not the boardmaster states that theCitybus #208 will be retired.  However, the statement #21 has disproventhe statement #5 what has been said.

P.S.1. Definition:
The boardmaster represents the boardmate who writes the first essay(#1).  In this case, Boardmate ad63 is the boardmaster of thisdiscussion, not Boardmate Susan.


P.S.2.
The essay #5 can be reported if someone thinks that there may be suspension to break the rule.

可能版友Susan在本版過往出文冒犯過人, 但係本文內很多接近針對他人的文章,
點解大家唔和氣一點呢.

版友hp7629中文是否不好呢? 版友Susan唔係話 "will be retired", 而係 "wonder if the bus may be retired",
佢提出一個可能值得討論的疑問都要俾人report? 希望唔係你俾人report針對他人啦.


回正題, 如果架208四日就出得番來行, 令我覺得巴士的結構很化學, 車身原來只是很多件小積木,
很大可能係不堪一擊, 搭巴士真係要小心唔好發夢.

原帖由 Route_99 於 2007-11-28 13:44 發表


可能版友Susan在本版過往出文冒犯過人, 但係本文內很多接近針對他人的文章,
點解大家唔和氣一點呢.

版友hp7629中文是否不好呢? 版友Susan唔係話 "will be retired", 而係 "wonder if the bus may be retired",
...

其實主要係某版友每次對撞左既車提出會唔會退役既問題，不論架車係大撞定小撞。

本人絕對無針對邊個，只不過係有個奇怪既反應者。

原帖由 DA21 於 2007-11-28 17:57 發表


其實主要係某版友每次對撞左既車提出會唔會退役既問題，不論架車係大撞定小撞。

本人絕對無針對邊個，只不過係有個奇怪既反應者。

可能唔係一個人提出會唔會退役既問題, 而係有一group 人不同時間經常問d差唔多既野

原帖由 Chris_Lam 於 2007-11-24 23:06 發表
又有排都唔駛出街囉~~~~~~
上層右邊柱位斷開左....應該係附近有枝野打橫伸左出黎......部208個司機又無為意....咁就...................

唔係整好耐je
今日佢出返嚟啦
行606

No matter what, Boardmate Susan gives very bad statement because one always states the false statement.  Furthermore, one states the statement that can be true or false, but later, the statement is proven as false.

Another example: one (Boardmate Susan) states that DA 66 will become open-toped bus and DM6 may substitue Citybus #7, but one is attacted because one cannot prove if the statement is true.

Return to the topic, I have not stated anyone should be reported; you may report this or you do not report this.  However, Boardmate Susan usully states the wrong statement.  Furthermore, if other boardmate reads the statement better, one can even think that Boardmate Susan wants the bus to be retired.  This is the mistake that I would like to discuss here.


I beleive that thinking carefully before the essay is typed is important, but in sometime, I cannot do this better.    Sorry for the misunderstanding.

As I have studied different cases, some boardmates such as Susan, JT4686 are attacted just because some or even many boardmates do not like them.  I omit the discussion here, but the situation can be though by everyone.

Ends here, or everyone can have trouble.



[ 本帖最後由 hp7629 於 2007-11-29 03:05 編輯 ]

Wait!!  I see 208 going route 606 again today~~

But the look is a bit strange~