hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

 找回密碼
 會員申請加入


(B0)香港巴士車務及車廂設備 (B1)香港巴士廣告消息/廣告車行踪 (B2)香港巴士討論 [熱門] [精華] (B3)巴士攝影作品貼圖區 [熱門] [精華] (B3i)即拍即貼 -手機相&翻拍Mon相 (B4)兩岸三地巴士討論 [精華] (B5)外地巴士討論 [精華]

Advertisement


(B6)旅遊巴士及過境巴士 [精華] (B7)巴士特別所見 (B11)巴士精華區 (B22)巴士迷吹水區   (V)私家車,商用車,政府及特種車輛 [精華]
(A6)相片及短片分享/攝影技術 (A10)香港地方討論 [精華] (A11)消費著數及飲食資訊 (A16)建築物機電裝置及設備 (A19)問路專區 (N)其他討論題目  
(F1)交通路線建議 (C2)航空 [精華] (C3)海上交通及船隻 [精華] (D1)公共交通有關商品 [精華]   (Y)hkitalk.net會員福利部 (Z)站務資源中心
(R1)香港鐵路 [精華] (R2)香港電車 [精華] (R3)港外鐵路 [精華]   (O1)omsi討論區 (O2)omsi下載區 (O3)omsi教學及求助區
(M1)小型巴士綜合討論 (M2)小型巴士多媒體分享區 (M3)香港小型巴士字軌表        
 

Advertisement

 

hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網»論壇 (B) Bus 巴士討論區 外地巴士討論 (B5) [GB] Transdev London SP25
12
返回列表 發新帖
開啟左側

[GB] Transdev London SP25

[複製鏈接]
 樓主| NV58 發表於 2008-4-21 01:15 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 yblumann 於 2008-4-20 16:34 發表
Route 702:
I know it sounds really complicated, but this reflects the legal status of PSV services in Greater London...sorry!
The order for the V9TL for route 702 did not need approval from TfL, asthe 702 is a commercial and not a TfL route- so it is not a  normal'london bus route', therefore the buses need to comply only with theLEZ regulations [low emission zone]- which they will do...[which is whyI did not refer to this order].
[one good test is that you can not use Travelcards on the 702! ]
The buses should come in a green livery and 'coach seats'- and besingle door. in fact, they should be a standard First Wright bodied B9volvo with more comfortable seats.


Of course I know the 702 is not an LBSL service (I never said it was!). It never dawn on me that these Green Line B9TLs will have the London-spec anyway, but rather more likely the First specification outside London. I don't agree with your note about the livery though - the Barlie-liveried B7R/Profiles give a clue, unless the coaches were not destined to stay on the 702 very long in the first place, which I haven't heard about. As for the coach seat, you are more likely to see the leather dual-purpose seats I think, much like some similar vehicle with First Manchester.

原帖由 yblumann 於 2008-4-20 16:34 發表
The B9TL wright demonstrator is in service on route 74-and it soundsthe same.  I have no idea if any modifications were made to the bus.
The batch of VLWs on route 74 are almost the newest batch of volvoB7TL, and have not developed the noise problem as the older buses.

a bit more re: volvo B7L noise problem:
The problem with the noise in London seems to relate to the time thebus has spent in service- and,  it takes about  24-36 months in servicebefore the noise becomes a problem.
If we take for an example the batch of B7s delivered for route 390,they started being noisy about 9 months ago. the same applies to thehuge batch delivered for the conversion of routes 6 & 98- thenumber of noisy buses have  been increasing steadily. Routes 6 98 &390 lost their Routemasters in 2004-5...
Another factor seems to be good engineering- and Arriva and Go Aheadbuses in London seems to be less effected than buses from First andMetroline.


You say that, but it seems the problem is less prominent on the early built B7TLs (V to 02 reg ones in particular). The ones built from 2002 and on seems to suffer a lot more cooling fan problems in comparison. Agree about the new built B7s though, although it's more likely their cooling fan hasn't failed just yet..... Also agree with the maintenance effort put in by specific operators as well, esp. considering the cause of the problem in the first place, one would assume some of them will be bother (or not) fixing it.

原帖由 yblumann 於 2008-4-20 16:34 發表
and finally: volvo B9TL orders for TfL bus route network:
The order for the wright bodied buses also includes 9 [or 10] Wrightbodied buses for route 23 in London. some are understood to by hybridsand some would be B9TLs. Interestingly, the public announcementconcerning this order have been rather lacking - when it comes exactdetails. Most experimental buses for London are ordered nowadays byLondon Buses [through a leasing arrangement with Dawson Rentals].


The order is for 9 buses, 4 diesels and 5 hybrid. From all the sources I have read, they are certainly not B9TLs, but the new integral bus developed by Wrightbus themselves. Here is a couple of links for your reference:

http://www.busandcoach.com/newsstory.aspx?id=1769

http://www.busandcoach.com/newsstory.aspx?id=1724
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
kmb_gu657 發表於 2008-4-21 08:16 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 yblumann 於 2008-4-21 00:34 發表 a bit more re: volvo B7L noise problem:
The problem with the noise in London seems to relate to the time the bus has spent in service- and,  it takes about  24-36 months in service before the noise becomes a problem.
If we take for an example the batch of B7s delivered for route 390, they started being noisy about 9 months ago. the same applies to the huge batch delivered for the conversion of routes 6 & 98- the number of noisy buses have  been increasing steadily. Routes 6 98 & 390 lost their Routemasters in 2004-5...
Another factor seems to be good engineering- and Arriva and Go Ahead buses in London seems to be less effected than buses from First and Metroline.



To be honest, I don't think this problem is related to the time the bus has spent in service. I spent a night in London just before Cobham in 2004, and throughout the night what I can hear is the soaring radiator of the brand new B7TL on service 24!
sunnykam 發表於 2008-4-21 20:13 | 顯示全部樓層
I hope Volvo can fix the cooling system problem of B9TL and B10TL in HK too!! They sound horrible esp when they get started...No matter new B9TL or old B10TL...
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請加入

本版積分規則

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

站規|清理本站Cookies|hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

GMT+8, 2025-6-7 20:44

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表