國泰未急購超級空巴 多載客減班次 乘客未必受落

[ref=298313]kitarolo[/ref]  在 2005-7-11 20:13 發表:



比較一下以下飛機的售價(港幣):
B744 ~12億
B777 ~15億
A330 ~8億

Airbus前個排將所有product既價錢增加左,23億應該係加價後既價錢.........

[ Last edited by billlmf on 2005-7-12 at 01:57 ]

[ref=298313]kitarolo[/ref]  在 2005-7-11 08:13 PM 發表:
B744 都漸漸轉做貨機,當然該批機年時已高,維修成本和航程穩定
已不太合作客機. 但國泰連416人的客機都不願買全新,相信買 A380
的機會也不高.

One of the major trouble should be the decline of the airline industry after 911 and the rising oil fee, forcing the airlines to revise on their plan.  The advantage of using second hand planes is that most of them are available in short time and won't be too expensive, when compare with new planes.

[ref=298330]kychung[/ref]  在 2005-7-11 08:22 PM 發表:
波音787就係針對點到點長途航班做賣點
睇黎而家事實都證明左市場對A380咁大ge飛機ge需求都唔係咁大

It was quite funny to watch such statement when the same wordings were being said by other major plane producers in the 60's, when Boeing has just developed the 747.

[ref=298561]hr8473[/ref]  在 2005-7-11 10:52 PM 發表:
Adding frequencies is not an option in many airports (eg LHR/NRT). If you want to add capcity, the only thing to do is to get a bigger plane. This problem will become obvious in 5-10 years when the traffic increase.

Apart from the limited slots, the landing fee is another trouble also.

Time is a critical factor for some passengers, as most passengers would like to arrive in a place in a particular time slot.  Adding smaller planes with more frequency may not help the company to carry more passengers, since quite a lot of the passengers would have the time limit.

[ref=298438]GC431[/ref]  在 2005-7-11 09:51 PM 發表:





747 平過777 ??
777要用差不多兩架330
唔係掛?

愚問:呢個係二手價定一手價...

777 is more expensive is because 777 use better/higher technology and also newer design...
The price should be the manufactory listed price there...
Airbus are pretty cheap and the material that they use are pretty cheap too... So which make the maintiance cost for Airbus higher than Boeing...

其實 A346 有咩問題
我知佢成日壞
禁佢壞D 咩?

[ref=298991]ASAW[/ref]  在 2005-7-12 10:00 發表:

其實 A346 有咩問題
我知佢成日壞
禁佢壞D 咩?

係System同埋副偈耐唔耐壞下,仲有HQA & HQB既wing係過重,HQC就OK,但係個performance都係麻麻......

竟然國泰對A380有保留，
而波音今年內推出747Adv，
唔知A380同747Adv既載客究竟有幾大分別？

國泰對747Adv會否比A380較有興趣？

Well... B747Adv capacity would be lower than A380... It's capacity should be in between B744 and A380... But no detail information has been give out yet...
B747Adv will be using newer technology and also a upgrade cabin, crew rest area etc...
I think CX is interested on both B747Adv and A380... If Boeing decide to go ahead, it is more than likely that CX would go ahead with B747Adv rather than wait around and see how A380 turn out...

[ref=299755]nwfb1110[/ref]  在 12/7/2005 21:46 發表:

竟然國泰對A380有保留，
而波音今年內推出747Adv，
唔知A380同747Adv既載客究竟有幾大分別？

國泰對747Adv會否比A380較有興趣？

好似話催波音出747Adv催得最急ge就係國泰
如果747Adv真係出得成
國泰都應該走唔甩係launch customer