hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

 找回密碼
 會員申請加入


(B0)香港巴士車務及車廂設備 (B1)香港巴士廣告消息/廣告車行踪 (B2)香港巴士討論 [熱門] [精華] (B3)巴士攝影作品貼圖區 [熱門] [精華] (B3i)即拍即貼 -手機相&翻拍Mon相 (B4)兩岸三地巴士討論 [精華] (B5)外地巴士討論 [精華]

Advertisement


(B6)旅遊巴士及過境巴士 [精華] (B7)巴士特別所見 (B11)巴士精華區 (B22)巴士迷吹水區   (V)私家車,商用車,政府及特種車輛 [精華]
(A6)相片及短片分享/攝影技術 (A10)香港地方討論 [精華] (A11)消費著數及飲食資訊 (A16)建築物機電裝置及設備 (A19)問路專區 (N)其他討論題目  
(F1)交通路線建議 (C2)航空 [精華] (C3)海上交通及船隻 [精華] (D1)公共交通有關商品 [精華]   (Y)hkitalk.net會員福利部 (Z)站務資源中心
(R1)香港鐵路 [精華] (R2)香港電車 [精華] (R3)港外鐵路 [精華]   (O1)omsi討論區 (O2)omsi下載區 (O3)omsi教學及求助區
(M1)小型巴士綜合討論 (M2)小型巴士多媒體分享區 (M3)香港小型巴士字軌表        
 

Advertisement

 

hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網»論壇 (B) Bus 巴士討論區 兩岸三地巴士 (B4) 宇通SCHOOL BUS
開啟左側

[中國大陸] 宇通SCHOOL BUS

[複製鏈接]
 樓主| LA16-3ASV465-51 發表於 2008-9-7 00:54 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 AV115 於 2008-9-7 00:27 發表
其實美國好多校巴唔同廠 d bodywork 都好似,我懷疑係同一間公司出 body 既

同一個車身設計圖吧...
JZ3968 發表於 2008-9-7 12:31 | 顯示全部樓層
點解美國一定要用凸頭? 點解原本可以放車底的引擎, 放在凸頭上會大左咁多?

[ 本帖最後由 JZ3968 於 2008-9-7 12:34 編輯 ]
sap32aaa 發表於 2008-9-7 13:04 | 顯示全部樓層
車禍時可做為緩衝空間...?
http://sap32aaa.pixnet.net/blog
yuenchiu6 發表於 2008-9-7 14:27 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 JZ3968 於 2008-9-7 12:31 發表
點解美國一定要用凸頭? 點解原本可以放車底的引擎, 放在凸頭上會大左咁多?


No. Most school buses in the US are rear-engined
kinfaiy 發表於 2008-9-8 11:22 | 顯示全部樓層
這車是否引入美國的車身款式,是葉片避震,還是氣墊避震?
art0925 發表於 2008-9-8 13:48 | 顯示全部樓層
It also depends on the budget of the school district, in WA, most school bus are rear engine made by Blue Bird or Thomas Build buses (Thomas uses Mercedes Engines), and Blue Bird uses either Catepilla, Cummins or John Deer.  those Front engine buses are mostly truck chassis from International Navister or Freightliner, they are cheaper but harsher ride.  and most body look similar because there are a federal requirement to follow, so most of the spec are similar.  also, due to the federal Mandate, a school bus cause more then a New Flyer D60LF or a Alexander Dennis E 500.


原帖由 JZ3968 於 2008-9-7 12:31 發表
點解美國一定要用凸頭? 點解原本可以放車底的引擎, 放在凸頭上會大左咁多?
kenchan_0710 發表於 2008-9-8 19:56 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



What kind of regulation can make a truck cost more than a E500?

It would not be possible in HK!
抗戰二十年
AVD1_LJ7006 發表於 2008-9-9 09:48 | 顯示全部樓層
小弟喺美國讀書嘅經驗,校巴只有兩隻車身牌子(bluebird 同 Thomas,仲有一間已執笠嘅Crown(只有自己出嘅底盤配校巴)),佢地有出自己底盤,用佢地自己底盤嘅多數都係平頭嘅,仲有美國校巴係冇冷氣嘅,D櫈又唔舒服,小弟個人較喜歡Thomas嘅校巴(好快同設計較新),有咩想問就間la,答得嘅我都會答
art0925 發表於 2008-9-9 11:31 | 顯示全部樓層
Material, fire regulation, seat padding, driver position, colour, height, window size, reflective material, etc etc...they may look like a normal bus, but the inside is totally different, and because of the straight guideline to follow, they manufacture high is alot higher then normal bus, u can ask ur Local GAO office, school district, and manufacture for the price of the school, and u will be scared....

Btw, not only BB or Thomas, there are also Collins, mid-bus and a few other company make school bus, but only BB and thomas have rear engine chassics made by Spartan bus or Freightliner.

原帖由 kenchan_0710 於 2008-9-8 19:56 發表
What kind of regulation can make a truck cost more than a E500?

It would not be possible in HK!
d
art0925 發表於 2008-9-9 11:34 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



haha, me personally like Thomas too, the RE with Mercedes Engine is great, Blue Bird ok la, the cummins ISLe is loud though, and the John  Deere is crap.  in US, only MB, Cummins and Cat engine are good...also Aillison B500R gear box....

US school bus have A/c ga, those in the Flordia and some part of CA has a/c on top, thermo king unit.


原帖由 AVD1_LJ7006 於 2008-9-9 09:48 發表
小弟喺美國讀書嘅經驗,校巴只有兩隻車身牌子(bluebird 同 Thomas,仲有一間已執笠嘅Crown(只有自己出嘅底盤配校巴)),佢地有出自己底盤,用佢地自己底盤嘅多數都係平頭嘅,仲有美國校巴係冇冷氣嘅,D櫈又唔舒服,小弟個人較喜歡T ...
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請加入

本版積分規則

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

站規|清理本站Cookies|hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

GMT+8, 2025-5-3 00:21

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表