由於70K兜入清河村後相對來說比較兜,故此我建議一條沒有那麼兜的路
2nd edition:
1. Split 273A to 273A and 273E
2.Route of 70K:
Sheung Shui B/T or (Tsui Lai B/T--> o Shek Wu Road-->San Fung Road) --> (Ting Ping Road)-->(Ma Sik Road)-->(Wo Muk Road)-->Luen Wo Hui B/T-->(Sha Tau kok Road)-->(San Wan Road)-->(Jockey Club Road)-->(Pak Wo Road)-->(Wah Ming Road / Yat Ming Road[near Yan Shing Court])-->(Lui Ming Road)-->Wah Ming B/T
Wah Ming B/T-->(Pak Wo Road)-->(Yat Ming Road)-->(Jockey club Road)[add stops in the reserved bay](Near Lee Ka Shing School and the opposite to SHS police station] ( Serve students)-->(Sha Tau Kok Road)-->LWH B/T-->(Wo Muk Road)-->(Fan Leng Lau Road)-->(Ma Sik Road)-->(Tin Ping Road)-->(Lung Shum Road)-->(SHS B/T)
(The returning route is not via Fanling is because of other lines has taken part in serving that place.
70K will no longer be a circular route with the route I suggested
Frequency:
10 miniutes in non-peak hours
5-7 miniutes in peak hours
Weekends:
8-10 miniutes all day
Suggested fee:
SHS<-->LWH :3.2
LWH<-->Wah Ming: 3.2
Full fare: 3.7
(P.S. The line of 501K/501A is $3.5)
3.Route of 273E:
Choi Yuen-->SSGSS----------->(All way along Pak Wo Road)-->(Wah Ming Road)[from Yan Shing Court]-->(Yat Ming Road)-->(All way along Pak Wo Road)
Buses:
share half with 273A
Advantage:
Half of the 273 route will serve as a fast route which can substitue the change of 70K to not via Pak Wo Road.
Increase the speed of 273 series and decrease the time of traveling for the pessengers from SHS to Fanling or Wah Ming
70K may lower its price which can increase competitveness with minibuses by a lower price.
The travelling time of 70K from SHS to Wah Ming will be lowered.
The pressure on Wah Ming B/T will be lowered
Disadvantage:
May lead to 273A and 273E arrive at a stop together and not utilise the resources(which it is common for current 273A due to conststant stopings)
The pessengers in the Jockey Club Road will not be served(Which it may serve by other 7X lines by a half way fare)
The new 70K's frequency is not high enough ti compete with minibuses.
1st edition:
(華明----------->)[已改不經] 清河巴總-->曾梅千禧-->丙崗-->大頭嶺-->新豐路-->(上水鐵路站[可不經])-->新城路-->天平-->(馬適路)-->(粉嶺樓路)-->聯和墟巴總-->沙頭角道-->粉嶺-->(華明路)-->百和路-->一鳴路-->華明巴總/和合石巴總
價錢:3.7
石湖墟至聯和墟 $3.2分段
清河至天平 $3.2分段
聯和墟至華明 $3.2分段
1.可以使清河居民前往石湖墟
2.吸納石湖墟至聯和墟的客(行去小巴站要行不少的)
3.增加競爭力
[ 本帖最後由 hkstudent 於 2008-12-13 10:05 編輯 ] |
評分
-
| 參與人數 2 | aPower -10 |
收起
理由
|
 AD18
| -5 |
閣下的建議
完全看不出有任何的競爭力 ... |
 EU5472
| -5 |
個建議真係好唔得
如果好似你咁做,70K已經( ... |
查看全部評分
|
|
零容忍小巴不公平違規的問題
|
|
|
|
|
|
算啦,呢間公司叫九巴,邊有心情同小巴搶客.
70K唔再減班已經好好啦... |
|
|
屎巴特色: 亂PLAN線,燒銀紙,趕乘客,保冗員,乞政府,屈特工
|
|
|
|
|
|
如果佢係執線的話,係可以贏的,
可惜佢唔搞,搞出條煩線 |
|
|
零容忍小巴不公平違規的問題
|
|
|
|
|
|
粗字果段已經夠晒兜
兜足一個大圈
*你真好野
應該係話
70K 唔再時不時間接減班已經好好 |
|
|
要針對ADL呢間如此垃圾既車廠，理由唔需要多
|
|
|
|
|
|
佢d建議不嬲都係咁啦
上次273A個建議,行兩次華明路都係咁啦...
"丙崗-->大頭嶺"
呢段有幾可有人上/落車?
我寧願要返之前九巴未改路個版本好過
(其實整個273B<--->70K轉乘咪搞惦囉)
再唔係整係個273A<--->70K咪仲好(而加個轉乘好似有限制個方向)
唔經上水火車站,即係同70K掘墳墓
唔該#1位人兄去搭下70K啦
不知有幾多人搭70K去上火,繁時幾乎落左部車既6~7成人
其實70K比273A行既路仲多,有可能同價咩?
可能$3.9會好些少
[ 本帖最後由 EU5472 於 2008-12-9 00:07 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
區內線都玩分段?
你想玩薄利多銷?
咁搞法,273A遲早比你拖低(好多人搭佢都係因為平,寧願兜都無所謂)
請搭273B,再行過去
或者,請搭273B,再轉270
只要增加273B<--->270既轉乘優惠就得啦
原本既70K都得啦,邊洗改路?
搶左273A既客,就叫做增加競爭力?
搶埋273B既客,又叫做增加競爭力? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For your first question,
My suggestion donh't overlap 273A which will not compete with 273A
(Please see the word "已改不經")
Second,the 270 doesn't go to Western of Shek Wu Hui which the new line oes there.
Third, just like my answer in Q1
Fourth,If the price is 3.9, it is still useless to have a reduction on fare |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
|
零容忍小巴不公平違規的問題
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a circle?
No!
As you use Po Shek Wu Road, San Fung Road is a essential Road to go to SWH!
Also, I don't have any road overlaped to the line |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
|
零容忍小巴不公平違規的問題
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
樓主
