我覺得兩款都唔靚!
其實RM根本不適合現代需求, 何必再多此一舉研製新RM呢?
保留兩條旅遊路線已經足夠了!
花心機去研究怎樣保養那些舊RM好過啦!
送給Boris Johnson:
放手 放開所有 彼此更自由
放手 其實我絕非愛得不夠
放手 豁出所有 還有這個好友
已經 已經足夠
放手 我的牽掛 找不到盡頭
放手 期望你幸福甚麼都有
也許 愛很深厚 然而我早看得透
放手 至可擁有 |
|
|
|
|
RM最受歡迎就系可以周街跳上跳落,同埋唔駛排隊等買飛嘛。聽講話搭市區線RM快過其他車多多聲! |
|
|
|
|
回復 4# 的帖子
第一,二事實上的確係好方便。。。
但小弟反而覺得 掛接都係好快的。。
小弟覺得而家經濟唔好,仲浪費一大筆錢來換車。。
錢多都唔好今樣浪費啊。。。大佬
你估仲好似以前咩。。。 |
|
stagecoach。megabus。citylink
|
|
|
Well, sometimes collective memories can trumpt the real situation....I wonder is there any current/ future mayors willing to take the risk of axing a London Icon again...that person will definitly pay the price by losing the vote....When it comes to routemaster, Londoners are more emotional on this subject then sensible. I have a few Londoners frd that hate the guts on the Bendy....just because it's too long and not made in UK. |
|
|
|
|
之前好似見過構想3軸Routemaster, 很科幻 |
|
|
|
|
依家英國都好窮啦,仲要晒一大筆錢換走批掛接為乜??
愚問:批掛接之後會點處置? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 98C 於 2009-1-4 11:52 發表 
依家英國都好窮啦,仲要晒一大筆錢換走批掛接為乜??
愚問:批掛接之後會點處置?
I agree with every single word you said.
At times like this, should he really throw away public money like this? |
|
BN1E18LE11WA5PE16SG8
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|