單層雖好, 但掛接更好

原帖由 偉文 於 2009-2-13 22:57 發表
倫敦遇到的問題就是呢d掛摺車太長, 塞住個路口(車尾部份), 搞到block住與它90度角的另一條路的其他車: 綠燈都過唔到個街口, 其他交通罵罵聲.

逐漸變成一個政治籌碼, 新市長上台的競選承諾之一就是'get rid of thes ...

哎喲...早排有篇文呀...話取代bendy係因為佢地唔係英國車呀...難為佢地仲自稱熟知當地國情

原帖由 S3N92 於 2009-2-14 15:37 發表

哎喲...早排有篇文呀...話取代bendy係因為佢地唔係英國車呀...難為佢地仲自稱熟知當地國情

It is not the key reason for it, think about all the Volvos and Scanias in around Britain anyway. People just take that as a convenient excuse to shoot the bendibus down a bit more easily. It's up to anyone to believe whatever reason they see fit anyway, what's to point of dragging this argument back on again?

以香港的道路環境及營運者的經營角度，行掛接車是「不設實際」。

掛接車可能在停站或轉彎時，部份車身會佔部份行車線/行人路，影響交通及其他道路使用者的安全。而且不少高客量的路線所途經的街道都是車多路窄，行起來唔靈活。

車輛調動方面，都會受到限制，有時出現「有車泊係度，有車用唔到」的情況。

原帖由 天空之神 於 2009-2-13 23:01 發表
18 米 , 已經可以將呢篇文拎去處理

香港只可以比 15 米掛接單層出牌

法例夠寫明巴士闊度唔可以超過2.5米啦,
咪又係有2.55米既巴士出到牌

只要你試車成功既話, 運吉就可以出到牌.

你話0.05米長d
定
3米長d呢?

多左3米,好多野都會唔同左

* 而家AN轉彎已經有些少掃尾,如果18米掛接會掃幾多呢?

[ 本帖最後由 EU5472 於 2009-2-15 10:36 編輯 ]

而家路面行 12 米都塞車塞到咁
絕對唔睇好 18 米掛接能夠行

除非巴士公司肯用 2 架雙層換 1 架掛接車

當年架 15 米車試驗之後
都冇同款車黎香港載客啦

原帖由 NV58 於 2009-2-13 05:15 發表


Well, probably more to do with anything from Mercedes, actually, rather than British buses themselves. Putting bendibus in HK roads is just about one of the daftest idea anyone can ever come up with ...

Obsession is not the right word, passion is a better one.
Not unlike those patriots who shamelessly think that the Routemaster are still the best bus in the world,
they even called them “Monarch of the road” without any dignity.
Are you one of those people?