回 憶 中 華 旗 - 利 蘭 泰 坦 Ｂ１５型 ( ＴＣ１ - ＣＤ1213)

[ref=350558]~AD9[EU9513]~[/ref]  在 2005-8-25 06:28 PM 發表:

呢架TC1我未搭過呀,唉......
佢之前有冇行過d咩大線呀??
例如:2,2A,8等線?

2A線開辦時TC1已退役……

[ref=350558]~AD9[EU9513]~[/ref]  在 25-8-2005 18:28 發表:

呢架TC1我未搭過呀,唉......
佢之前有冇行過d咩大線呀??
例如:2,2A,8等線?

TC1 好"乖仔"架, 除左堅守260系的路線外, 晚年仲"深閨", 長期留守車廠, 成為車房的晨早打仗車, 其他司機都唔敢渣, 亦都唔識渣.

不過, 上文提及的兩段時期中間, TC1 好似和 BR1/2 等"怪獸"(兩軸) 行過一些東區特快線如 20, 21, 22, 80 .....

現在, TC1 的部份零件, 成為了小弟的珍藏呢! #

[ Last edited by DD2113 on 2005-8-25 at 23:41 ]

[ref=350987]DD2113[/ref]  在 2005-8-25 11:40 PM 發表:



TC1 好"乖仔"架, 除左堅守260系的路線外, 晚年仲"深閨", 長期留守車廠, 成為車房的晨早打仗車, 其他司機都唔敢渣, 亦都唔識渣.

不過, 上文提及的兩段時期中間, TC1 好似和 BR1/2 等&q ...

有幾難？？# 可否分享一下師兄？thx#;D

[ref=351008]5480[/ref]  在 25-8-2005 23:51 發表:

有幾難？？# 可否分享一下師兄？thx#;D

佢撻車時, 個波掣係要入在"S"(Start) 坑位才可以著車 (城巴開頂蘭12, 16等一樣), 唔係個個識架!!

如果唔係咁, 係完全著唔到車, .....咁其他人會以為係部車有問題, 就唔會攪佢啦!!

[ Last edited by DD2113 on 2005-8-26 at 00:15 ]

[ref=350540]DD2113[/ref]  在 2005-8-25 10:13 發表:
還有它是一體化(integral)的巴士設計, 只有Park Royal 車身可供"選擇", 買家除了 London Transport 之外, 實在少之又少, 出口版更只有TC1 一部!!

所以, Titan 當年的出現, 被夾在Fleetline/ Olympian 的年代之間, 而後者都有大量車身及引擎配套可供選擇時, Titan 的命運又怎會好??

That's not the main reason why Titan did not do well in terms of sales.

Apart from the industrial dispute between Leyland and Park Royal during
the early production of Titan, as pointed out by ads190, another reason
of the poor sales of Titan was it is much too sophisticated, and its design
was too far ahead from its time. That was driven by the design input from
the engineers from London Transport, which Leyland identified as the main
customer. It turned the Titan to a design which suits London better than
anywhere else. In fact, the design of Titan bears a lot of similarity to the
last double decker designed specificly for London - the FRM1.

Leyland intended to develop the Titan as the replacement of their aging
Atlantean, Fleetline and VRT. However, the poor sale of Titan, coupled
by the emergence of competing products, esp. the Metrobus from MCW,
prompted Leyland to abandon the idea and develop the Olympian instead.
In all sense, the Olympian is a less sophisticated, and a relatively less
advanced design to the Titan.

Another major difference between the Titan and Olympian is the Titan
has independent front suspension, like the Routemaster and FRM1. It
proved so good that Volvo took up the design and incorporate it onto all
their low floor chassis design, including the B7TL, B9TL and B10TL.

雖則Titan賣得比Fleetine同Olympian差, 但matchbox又出Titan. 是否巧合?
我仲細時有架Matchbox Titan, 成日以為Titan在英國好受歡迎, 所以有這架巴士仔.

[ref=350727]HN7067[/ref]  在 2005-8-25 08:36 PM 發表:

中巴TC1係一部不折不扣豪華巴士, 但點解從未上過豪華色彩??

佢一直都係上住豪華色喎....

[ref=351397]oxball[/ref]  在 26-8-2005 14:03 發表:

佢一直都係上住豪華色喎....

其實細心留意o下, 會發現 TC1 的色彩同其他中巴有點不同 -- 介乎普通與豪華色之間:

佢條 China Motor Bus 是藍色, 貼在米色範圍; 米/藍色中間沒有黑線 ~~ 這些特徵和豪華的 MC, BR, FC 一樣;

不過佢下層窗門下面又冇米色粗線, 又冇啞黑色裙腳喎!!

還有, 它一直都沒有側(路線)牌, ..... 其實不符合一部專利巴士的法例要求! #

[ref=351171]NV58[/ref]  在 2005-8-26 02:44 AM 發表:



That's not the main reason why Titan did not do well in terms of sales.

Apart from the industrial dispute between Leyland and Park Royal during
the early production of Titan, as pointed out ...

!? Titan is better and more advanced but the final result it was a poor seller !? #

[ref=351414]DD2113[/ref]  在 2005-8-26 02:19 PM 發表:



其實細心留意o下, 會發現 TC1 的色彩同其他中巴有點不同 -- 介乎普通與豪華色之間:

佢條 China Motor Bus 是藍色, 貼在米色範圍; 米/藍色中間沒有黑線 ~~ 這些特徵和豪華的 MC, BR, FC 一樣;

不過佢下層 ...

點解個carlo唔用張紙?
thx!

[ Last edited by cswf on 2005-8-26 at 22:33 ]