FOILCAT

原帖由 GR614 於 2009-5-6 11:14 發表

咁似呢樣野好主觀既.....

anyway，講起Foilcat官方相，小弟縱橫港澳二十年，從未見過有Foilcat官方相係坐水既，如果有既麻煩大師貼上黎分享下

而翼航既官方相就見得多，最記得見過有張應該仲係係挪 ...

你搞到我心思思想睇下呢張試航相tim

原帖由 AnsonCCF 於 2009-5-6 11:26 發表

你搞到我心思思想睇下呢張試航相tim

應該係呢張
http://randburg.com/no/kvaefjel.html

原帖由 barca_399 於 2009-5-5 23:35 發表

其他公司亦唔見得有咁o既官方相...
請恕我冇品味.....我真係睇唔出似官方相....

唔知邊位版友覺得似呢?

或者佢睇過有 Tricat o既船頭相o既
廣告 poster 之後, 當 Foilcat 係 Tricat...

加佢 aPower 果位話 : '好似官方相o者...'
事實上係點, 大家心照啦!

[ 本帖最後由 a396 於 2009-5-6 13:12 編輯 ]

原帖由 GR614 於 2009-5-6 13:06 發表

應該係呢張
http://randburg.com/no/kvaefjel.html

真係幾鬼型wor,Thx

原帖由 a396 於 2009-5-6 13:08 發表

或者佢睇過有 Tricat o既船頭相o既
廣告 poster 之後, 當 Foilcat 係 Tricat...

加佢 aPower 果位話 : '好似官方相o者...'
事實上係點, 大家心照啦!

人地post 張Tricat 出黎係船尾相黎架

[ 本帖最後由 AnsonCCF 於 2009-5-6 13:21 編輯 ]

如果佢夠膽話當左 Foilcat 係 Tricat...
我會讚佢勇氣可加

[ 本帖最後由 barca_399 於 2009-5-6 16:02 編輯 ]

原帖由 AnsonCCF 於 2009-5-5 23:44 發表




How good for this photo to represent the product of  "Foilcat"? Please give reasons to support your definition, thank you.

A offical photo should present the feature of an product. In this picture , it show the huge size of foilcat, however, it cannot show that the another feature of foilcat- flying . That's why I 've add a statement behind the sentences
anyway, this explain must not be satisfied by all of you,sorry.

原帖由 horta 於 2009-5-6 15:55 發表

A offical photo should present the feature of an product. In this picture , it show the huge size of foilcat, however, it cannot show that the another feature of foilcat- flying . That's why I 've ad ...

你都係聽o下人地講
去睇睇售票處果張官方相係點,
先再想一想呢個加分原因值唔值得俾啦

我就咁多年都未見過jetfoil 同foilcat 官方相唔係用翼航緊o既相啦......
官方更加唔會蠢到連隻船o既賣點都唔show 出黎 lo~~~

如果你係官方相o既設計o者,公司就真係多得你唔少....
foilcat 個樣都已經笨笨地....仲要唔係飛緊....
你出官方相會係趕客多過吸引客人

[ 本帖最後由 barca_399 於 2009-5-6 16:05 編輯 ]

原帖由 barca_399 於 2009-5-6 16:01 發表


你都係聽o下人地講
去睇睇售票處果張官方相係點,
先再想一想呢個加分原因值唔值得俾啦

我就咁多年都未見過jetfoil 同foilcat 官方相唔係用翼航緊o既相啦......
官方更加唔會蠢到連隻船o既賣點都唔show 出黎 lo~~~ ...

that's why I add an "if" statement behind, alright?
And I have never said that there are some similar photo appeared in the past...
anyway, I am out of fashion, sorry.

[ 本帖最後由 horta 於 2009-5-6 16:17 編輯 ]

原帖由 horta 於 2009-5-6 16:12 發表

that's why I add an "if" statement behind, alright?

我唔知你if 乜...你亦都唔講落去
我只係知你第一句已經好清楚打出"Just like an offical photo"
好明顯你已經係讚緊一張唔似官方相o既相,似一張官方相,
好在呢度唔可以扣加分果個...如果唔係我一定第一個扣你分

[ 本帖最後由 barca_399 於 2009-5-6 16:19 編輯 ]

原帖由 barca_399 於 2009-5-6 16:16 發表


我唔知你if 乜...你亦都唔講落去
我只係知你第一句已經好清楚打出"Just like an offical photo"
好明顯你已經係讚緊一張唔似官方相o既相,似一張官方相,
好在呢度唔可以扣加分果個...如果唔係我一定第一個扣你分 ...

okok, click report or please deduct marks from my reply due to I gave an unacceptable explaination,thank you...