買C記真係一D保障都冇?

原帖由 牛奶仔 於 2009-8-15 21:42 發表


個人問題? 願聞其詳!!!

開頭我都以為係個別機既問題, 後來換過350D同另外一部400D都有同樣問題......

可吾可以貼你覺得眼花花張相來看看?可能我個人要求低

[ 本帖最後由 horta 於 2009-8-16 01:13 編輯 ]

To be fair ,I quota a review from DPreview of D60 and 1000d.
D60

Inevitably it's not all great news; as someone who always shoots RAW+JPEG I found Nikon's decision to retain the crippled 'Basic JPEG only' option when shooting in this mode frustrating (the Basic JPEGs are way too compressed for serious use). High ISO performance isn't quite up to Canon's standards, and the lack of 'mid range' features (most crucially exposure bracketing and a vertical grip option) may not be of importance to the target market, but seem designed purely to push more serious users up the Nikon range to the ageing D80. The lack of AF support for lenses without a built-in motor is less of an issue; there's plenty of AF-S lenses to choose from (as well as an increasing number of third-party options from the likes of Sigma), and frankly if you're looking to use more exotic glass or have a collection of older zooms / primes you're simply not going to be looking at the D60 as an option. If you do want to shoot with Nikon primes or older zooms you'll be stuck with manual focus (though this is now a lot easier thanks to the new rangefinder).

1000d

Canon's lead of the entry-level market has slipped in recent years (in certain markets) and the 1000D doesn't stand out from the competition as much as previous models. It's certainly a safe bet and one of the most consistent offerings in the sector (it has few annoying quirks or niggling loose ends) and its all-round competance, excellent high ISO performance and class-leading image quality will win it a lot of friends.

原帖由 牛奶仔 於 15/8/2009 21:42 發表


個人問題? 願聞其詳!!!

開頭我都以為係個別機既問題, 後來換過350D同另外一部400D都有同樣問題......

可能你高要求
300D既ISO 1600(原相+副廠雞鏡)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/xmc2fl
其實,有時NOISE既問題同枝鏡都有D關係
用一輯演唱會既相已經分到高低
基本條件係位置先決,一枝70-200,ISO800或以上
可以試下用18-200,70-300去比較下
有時睇相吾好諗人地用乜牌子既機去影
諗下人地用枝乜野鏡去影好過(雖然機同鏡既配合係重要)

原帖由 horta 於 2009-8-16 01:02 發表

你不如用300d vs D3x level 都吾同! 我宜家係$4000 vs$4000 入門機

仲有, ISO800(1000d)print 4R d noise 都吾係太覺 (開左NR)

唔通要用D90對1D至算公平? 我用既機之中已經包括埋40D......

原帖由 牛奶仔 於 2009-8-16 15:02 發表


唔通要用D90對1D至算公平? 我用既機之中已經包括埋40D......

repeat
$4000 vs $4000 入門機

原帖由 horta 於 2009-8-16 15:07 發表
repeat
$4000 vs $4000 入門機

I ASK: 即係乜款對乜款???

我提既唔係乜LEVEL對乜LEVEL機既問題, 而係親自用過之後, 覺得整個系統出現問題而提出疑問, 唔係單單話300D OR 400D OR SOME MODEL ELSE! 同時我亦提出質疑點解一個缺點百出既系統可以有咁多人叫好, THAT'S IT!

[ 本帖最後由 牛奶仔 於 2009-8-16 16:11 編輯 ]

原帖由 牛奶仔 於 2009-8-16 16:07 發表


I ASK: 即係乜款對乜款???

我提既唔係乜LEVEL對乜LEVEL機既問題, 而係親自用過之後, 覺得整個系統出現問題而提出疑問, 唔係單單話300D OR 400D OR SOME MODEL ELSE! 同時我亦提出質疑點解一個缺點百出既系統可以 ...

有乜問題? 對於新手來說, canon system 係 user-friendly (相對nikon)
所以好多人入門用canon
而且,canon入門機的noise control (1000d)比 nikon(d60) 入門機的noise control好, 亦吸引人入會

仲有,如果c記缺點百出,那為何n,s,p,om 又吾叫缺點百出?

無錯,c記係qc差,但吾代表相質差

[ 本帖最後由 horta 於 2009-8-16 16:42 編輯 ]

原帖由 horta 於 2009-8-16 16:35 發表


有乜問題? 對於新手來說, canon system 係 user-friendly (相對nikon)
所以好多人入門用canon
而且,canon入門機的noise control (1000d)比 nikon(d60) 入門機的noise control好, 亦吸引人入會 ...

早前有位用 D60 既版友都話開到 ISO 800 就有明顯既 noise
但之前小弟用過 1000D 開到 ISO 800 就唔係好覺

其實一直都想講講, 就市場去睇, 無論 n記定c記, 本身都無
領導性的市場佔有, 實際上, 事實係2個系統都唔少人用...

如果其中一個系統, 真係差到無人有, 而另一系統又好咁多
的話, 又點會出現以上情況? 好多專業影相人士仍然用緊c記,
唔係新手wor...

影相是個人感受的行動, 人人的感覺都會唔同, 要求也會唔同,
有d人可能鍾意個質素, 有d人可以鍾意個介面,  有d人甚至喜
歡多noise

其實我好早都講左, 最緊要係搵到自己合適的品牌, 搵到自己
所喜愛的, 已經好足夠, 根本唔駛, 亦唔需要質疑人地點解用某
品牌, 如果太過偏激去批評/去撐一個品牌, 直言無乜好處..

只是想講, 切忌器材先決, 影好相最緊要係攝影師, 而唔係相機,
一部好相機是可以更有效幫到你, 但唔係影相過程之全部吧

無論c記定n記, 一樣可以影到靚相, that is the fact!

我在此亦以站友身份呼籲, 希望站友和諧討論吧..

[ 本帖最後由 3ASV196 於 2009-8-16 18:00 編輯 ]

原帖由 KR6870 於 2009-8-15 19:58 發表

咁應該SET咩功能
先可以控制NOISE

我記得有 '高 ISO 減 noise' o既功能,
唔知 400D 有冇.