[服務調整]
89D,89,89B,89X可否用 Neoplan Centroliner 做掛牌
[複製鏈接]
|
89D,89X都試過行 Neoplan
九廠可否把268C,269C的 Neoplan掛牌對調。89D,89X又唔係太長，對調本應為可以減少 Neoplan 的損耗。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89x 幾時行過ap?
如果AP係因為行長途損耗大咁點解到而家仲有大部分AP跑長途 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
以前有人講過，部份AP改行短途之或後，損耗同跑長短途係差唔多。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If AP is really going to go on 89 89B 89D 89X then the buses will get even more "tired" because of the steep hill after Tin Ma Court (89 89B). For 89D 89X the Tate's Cairn Tunnel is long and AP is noisy too after a long service. So I'd rather to hv the status as the same as now.
(Please forgive me as my chinese typing software is broken and is forced to use English) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 anthonyap1 於 2009-10-5 21:23 發表 
If AP is really going to go on 89 89B 89D 89X then the buses will get even more "tired" because of the steep hill after Tin Ma Court (89 89B). For 89D 89X the Tate's Cairn Tunnel is long and AP is noi ...
下, 而家D屯公線長過89X, 89D好多啦...
同埋呢, 268C 269C等等都行天馬苑,
咁點解唔行得89, 89B呢? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 kingprowm 於 2009-10-6 00:17 發表 
照計行到 12 米車既路線就應該行到 AP
非也..
鑽石山站係一例... |
|
|
AP11．JD9374
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 anthonyap1 於 2009-10-5 21:23 發表
If AP is really going to go on 89 89B 89D 89X then the buses will get even more "tired" because of the steep hill after Tin Ma Court (89 89B). For 89D 89X the Tate's Cairn Tunnel is long and AP is noi ...
唔係呀，以前277X都係用AP掛牌啦，都無問題 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
點解跑公路會傷車d???
香港d公路質素唔差,跑長途公路既車可以行到上高波低轉
又唔使成日開開停停,應該比跑市區線開開停停襟用好多先岩 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
