CTB & KMB Enviro400 arrived HK
[複製鏈接]
|
原帖由 on11358 於 2009-11-23 14:38 發表 
ASC淨重11.648噸,行車證準許載16.5噸,最多可以載81人,
11648+(82X每人重量KG)=16500,即係平均每人重60KG左右,
代返入呢部車既資料
13660KG+(89X60KG)=19000KG
超出法例准許差唔多20%,出事起上黎責任問題好難搞。 ...
Thing is though, I don't think it will get licensed to that maximum weight. At Europe the limit is 18 tonnes, and I can't see the HK government would let them out on the street beyond this limit (by law that is), as it will be very difficult to argue for a higher weight would not damage the roads (at 18tonnes, we had the MBs which set the precedence, and of course it's the limit in Europe as well, which in theory, will be easier to argue the case).
So doing the maths the other way round, an 18 tonnes limit (assume 60kg per pax) will give these E400 a capacity of 72. A London-spec E400 of that size have a H41/24D layout, giving 65 seats, and that equates to another 7 standing space. Only thing is, an average weight of 60kg per person sounds a bit low. Is this the government standard? |
|
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
|
|
|
車尾是否不會有「ENVIRO400」字樣?還是仍未裝上? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 FY3401 於 2009-11-23 18:22 發表 
咁老九果架E400
8成行大西北
因為得AL1 AS1 AS2三架樣板
沒有行大西北線 其他樣板都行過
E兩架E400係樣板
城記編號可能係2900
九記可能係ATU/ATG等等
AL1同AS1都行過元朗(東)時代的68X |
|
只有傻大包先可以同小蛮永遠在一起
|
|
|
原帖由 kenny_hou 於 2009-11-24 04:02 發表 
AL1同AS1都行過元朗(東)時代的68X
基本上AL1,AS1,同AS2都行過晒大西北既線
都唔明點解有啲人話冇行過 |
|
|
|
|
個人意見: 車尾設計ok, 不過硬係覺得唔適合配落E400度, 因為睇落好powerful, 冇左短車最殺食既「可愛感」!
大家都覺得頭幅靚, 我反而未接受到個頭幅頂部壓平左, 始終都係英國版好睇d!
上層兩側窗尾如果學英國版咁收一收個彎位, 會好睇d (應該唔難adopt落去)
不過好開心上車門保留原裝E400既一大特色!
最後, 大家有冇留意到城巴果架,
車身裙腳紅色部分仲粗過藍色部分, 感覺好怪, 同埋唔靚, 可能睇慣E500啦 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 kenny_hou 於 2009-11-24 04:02 發表 
AL1同AS1都行過元朗(東)時代的68X
無記錯既話連 AS2 都行過  |
|
要針對ADL呢間如此垃圾既車廠,理由唔需要多
|
|
|
當初我以為仲會花心機出矮版既新車
都好丫依家都冇咩短車
不過個句啦,轉左樣唔似E400之外,某程度上幾核突啊 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 NV58 於 2009-11-24 03:22 發表 
Thing is though, I don't think it will get licensed to that maximum weight. At Europe the limit is 18 tonnes, and I can't see the HK government would let them out on the street beyond this limit (by law that is), as it will be very difficult to argue for a higher weight would not damage the roads (at 18tonnes, we had the MBs which set the precedence, and of course it's the limit in Europe as well, which in theory, will be easier to argue the case).
如果唔計總重,只計軸重,呢部車的前軸法定最高負重係 9 噸,尾軸就係 10 噸.... (Cap. 374A Reg. 14)
如果用到盡的話,部車的確可以去到 19 噸...
Only thing is, an average weight of 60kg per person sounds a bit low. Is this the government standard?
傾側測試中,每個乘客的假設重量係 57kg。(Cap. 374A Reg. 55)
不過呢個只適用於傾側測試,唔代表係用黎計車輛載重。(暫時搵唔到) |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 da54 於 2009-11-24 10:12 發表 
如果唔計總重,只計軸重,呢部車的前軸法定最高負重係 9 噸,尾軸就係 10 噸.... (Cap. 374A Reg. 14)
如果用到盡的話,部車的確可以去到 19 噸...
傾側測試中,每個乘客的假設重量係 57kg。(Cap. 374A Reg. 55)
不過呢個只 ...
以前比較少肥人、 d 人平均來說係細粒 d
你睇以前有 3+2 座位就知
而家時代唔同, 57kg 呢個數就真係輕得滯
始終安全標準應該考慮埋較壞情況, 而唔止係平均情況 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|