原帖由 sutrak 於 2010-3-21 15:15 發表 
但係橫置引擎比縱置引擎動力損耗大, 而且宜家各公司已經有大量Trident + E500, 已經達到維修o既 Economic of Scale, 如果謬謬然轉用橫置引擎, 分分鐘令各公司唔買落去 ...
Although your point makes sense, but on a flip side, it leaves the E400 a bit like an orphan and simply leave the adavantage to Volvo, as the B9TL can do 2 and 3-axle version in a single type.
ATE24: I am skeptic how big an impact it will make to ditch the E500 and go with a 3-axle E400 would hand the market to Scania. Put it this way, Volvo never went along that route, and it still manage to sustain a large market share in HK. With respect, I feel the advantage of a mid-axle drive bus is a little overblown. |
|
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
|
|
|
原帖由 brian 於 2010-3-21 22:29 發表 
21:20 - 22:20,青衣油站冇踪影。
不過唔知隻船泊邊個碼頭呢?
葵涌上船就無乜理由會去左青衣入油既....
之前去青衣入油的車好似都係青衣上岸....
下次可以 check 海事處網頁睇下泊邊個碼頭先。
P.S. 今次係一號碼頭泊岸... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 da54 於 2010-3-22 02:00 發表 
葵涌上船就無乜理由會去左青衣入油既....
之前去青衣入油的車好似都係青衣上岸....
下次可以 check 海事處網頁睇下泊邊個碼頭先。
P.S. 今次係一號碼頭泊岸... ...
頭先check完知道泊一號就過去影o左張相…
不過等極都只係得一架九巴B9… 同埋大批私家車、拖頭、重型貨車…
最後冇等齊車就回家了…
ps: 好多年未試過咁神心去影新車…
[ 本帖最後由 brian 於 2010-3-22 02:05 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 NV58 於 2010-3-21 23:56 發表 
ATE24: I am skeptic how big an impact it will make to ditch the E500 and go with a 3-axle E400 would hand the market to Scania. Put it this way, Volvo never went along that route, and it still manage to sustain a large market share in HK. With respect, I feel the advantage of a mid-axle drive bus is a little overblown.
講起 112,甜橙咪又係周不時大大部超豪剷上去百福道總站。
有時唔係誇唔誇大o的咩o既,不過對住唔同o既客(尤其是對住兩間分別係「安全」第一同埋理得你死o既公司),有唔同o既產品都係應份o既,而我亦都相信 E500 o既設計有佢o既存在價值。 |
|
公器公用 香港早要有品
|
|
|
消息不真確,城(新?)巴 B9 並沒有到港! |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 da54 於 2010-3-22 14:17 發表 
消息不真確,城(新?)巴 B9 並沒有到港!
好對唔住! |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 RayNgan 於 2010-3-22 15:22 發表 
好對唔住!
我諗你都係轉載香討果邊 d 料.... 果邊 d 料時真時假...
其實唔可以怪晒你,不過下次最好講清楚 d 料係邊度黎,
咁我地可以再衡量下可信性.... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 RayNgan 於 2010-3-22 15:22 發表 
好對唔住!
好對唔住,請你說出消息來源,因為涉及資料不真實,涉嫌違反本板板規. |
|
屎巴特色: 亂PLAN線,燒銀紙,趕乘客,保冗員,乞政府,屈特工
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|