南港島線(東段)環評報告

南港島線(東段)環評報告
http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/regist ... _1852010/Index.html

http://www.mtr.com.hk/chi/projects/sileia/index.php

Figure 3.42.1
Location of Fixed Plant at South Horizons Plant Building and Entrance

呢個好睇~

當中有不少歷史圖片及地圖以供參考~

Appendix 3.6 – Target Train Speed profile
SOH -> LET: 880m; 78.76 sec
LET -> WCH: 1409m; 114.98 sec
WCH -> OCP: 744m; 74.95 sec
OCP -> ADM: 3868.95m; 217 sec

[ 本帖最後由 ronaldlau 於 2010-8-13 15:59 編輯 ]

連英軍總部都仲有, 會否太誇張

http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_1852010/EIA/PDF/Figures/11%20Cultural%20Heritage/FIGURE%2011-1.pdf

2.7.9           Train System

With consideration of the service level required, it was identified that a medium capacity railway is appropriate for SIL(E).  The rolling stock for SIL(E) is similar to those used in the existing Kwun Tong Line. With the shorter train length (3-cars) of the medium capacity system, length of platforms and stations can be reduced accordingly.  In general, this will reduce the potential environmental impact (in terms of extent and/or duration) that would be generated from the project during both the construction and operational phases.   

第一,
3-cars夠唔夠用嫁?
南區成班人靠佢,仲短過馬鐵,
會唔會廣州三號線重演?

第二,
similar to those used in the existing Kwun Tong Line真係可圈可點,
係是但講一條定係指C-train呢?
(小道消息指C-train會全部分配比KTL  )

我冇咁好心機逐條link去睇，多謝板友們post出來。

Similar to Kwun Tong Line，即係而家已經放棄膠輪？
我個人係贊成的，用返鐵輪車，日後發展會比較靈活。

迪迪尼都有四卡喎，智文公園得三卡？唔好玩啦。

原帖由 DIH 於 2010-8-12 23:01 發表
我冇咁好心機逐條link去睇，多謝板友們post出來。

Similar to Kwun Tong Line，即係而家已經放棄膠輪？
我個人係贊成的，用返鐵輪車，日後發展會比較靈活。

迪迪尼都有四卡喎，智文公園得三卡？唔好玩啦。 ...

迪士尼線的月台仲有空間行到8卡添...唔知南港島線東段會唔會預留空間加卡?

原帖由 93A_S3_6:30am 於 2010-8-12 21:55 發表


第一,
3-cars夠唔夠用嫁?
南區成班人靠佢,仲短過馬鐵,
會唔會廣州三號線重演?

第二,
similar to those used in the existing Kwun Tong Line真係可圈可點,
係是但講一條定係指C-train呢?
(小道消息指C-trai ...

即係綱輪但三卡, 每列 1125 人
每小時 max 30 班, = 33750人...
夠唔夠呢?.... 講真... 4 卡會好 d~