一篇蠻有趣的鐵道新聞

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/over-b ... 20100822-13asy.html

你覺得他在曲綫誇讚新南維爾士州的鐵路安全水準，在找藉口來辯護導自超支和延期交貨，還是在抱怨長春，“害”新火車不能準時交貨？

Typical Australian behaviour, trying to shift the blame to someone else for their own issues.

What I see the problem is, they are asking CRC to build a train that is so different in manufacturing process than the rest of the world, just think about the 50km/h crash protection, we are not building a train like a car on the road, a train is NOT MEANT TO CRASH if the signal system is reliable and bullet-proof!

The root of the problem is that, for the Sydney railway system, they can never use an off-the-shelf product, since there is so much requirements that they put in, are not required in anywhere else of the world.

And, don't fully believe the media, I've spoken to a few insiders in the project, the feedbacks are completely opposite to what the media has been publishing.

原帖由 kmb3asv3 於 2010-8-23 15:29 發表
Typical Australian behaviour, trying to shift the blame to someone else for their own issues.

What I see the problem is, they are asking CRC to build a train that is so different in manufacturing pro ...

I am not also fully believe in that report as well. I just treat it as some kind of joke to laugh at. Anyway, that news articles requires you t think in different perspectives and you may or may not draw any conclusions in the end.  It is good for general-eduaction since there are lots of thing worth to debate in class!

[ 本帖最後由 Chi_Hang 於 2010-8-23 18:30 編輯 ]

聽長春個邊講,
係悉尼比唔夠錢所以一路被Delay