原帖由 da93 於 2010-10-30 21:35 發表 
甘講,
同一道理亦唔會唔適用於沙田度,
再講,
新唔新車都係其次,
我都話冇咪拎架白板囉,
再唔係既拎架JB8234都好過整架膠豬,
有時係,
—件事有好多方法,
但點解呢間廠做野硬係點都有D野俾人見到其不足之處? ...
Well, you may think that JB8324 or even the non-low-floor air-cond buses are better than JH2737, but perhaps someone else have the opposite view, how can the bus company satisfy such a completely different desire? You find the so-called flaws from the re-scheduling just because you are not happy with this and try to pick up those so-called flaws. Wouldn't you think this is unfair to the re-scheduling, or even the bus company?
[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2010-10-30 23:42 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 da93 於 2010-10-30 21:35 發表 
但點解呢間廠做野硬係點都有D野俾人見到其不足之處? ...
係令你睇唔順眼咋掛? 咁講我覺得會多人認同d喎
[ 本帖最後由 cheuknam1245 於 2010-10-30 23:41 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
點解好似無人提過JH2737唔係歐三車的問題?
雖則話而家九巴可能已經將所有歐三車當普通金車咁用,但係旺區依然有歐二金車,
而歐四、歐五新車未咁快出牌的時後,係咪應該考慮下盡量將歐三金車派旺區線,盡量減低空氣污染呢?
而家九巴係有一堆歐二金車掛旺區線,又有堆歐三金車唔係掛旺區線,例如80K、85K、86K、296M等,
我粗俗估算過,如果將所有歐三或以上金車都掛旺區線,換走歐二金車,
旺區金車呢一刻應該爭少少可以全歐三化。 |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
fb.com/scientisthk2usa/
|
|
|
我就真係唔明勒
膠豬同電豬既座位有分別架咩?
認真一問, 闊身金巴既上層座椅同普通金巴既有無唔同? |
|
媽屐停
|
|
|
呢d3ASV....
上層窄位,下層全部卡位式接近直角椅背...細心睇下中門後面幾排位,椅背直到頭枕"坳"左向前..
遇著部超大聲roadshow,祝你好運... |
|
|
|
|
老實講,派膠豬我晤覺得好失禮,
反而今年8月沙田車廠派左架G 牌龍行307,就真係晤太好 |
|
|
|
|
回復 50# 的帖子
講真果句,
新D又唔爭在果幾個月車,
反而資源上,
已經唔需要再響沙田拎架車過去
有時唔係話膠豬坐唔坐得人,
白板都坐得架,
甘係咪我特登要插沙廠? |
|
|
|
|
回復 52# 的帖子
甘我多謝你件蛋糕先
想講提子味我感受唔到,
我都係住沙廠區域,
沙廠每日都出梗AVBWU俾我樓下果兩條線,
但係咪因為呢D新車我就可以視其他人既要求為唔合理?
話人地眼紅?
樓上講得岩,
調番轉塞部膠豬俾680,681,
我諗—樣會有人出聲,
有時衰D講,
我某程度上都享受緊沙田廠堆新車,
但我想有新既,
人地都會想,
甘點解要話人地發月經post?
[ 本帖最後由 da93 於 2010-10-31 00:56 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|