大佬,你地係咪玩野啊......

原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-8-9 00:42 發表


討論區就係發表己見嘅地方
如果連己見都要就住就住
咁仲有討論區意義？

而且你叫我唔好亂講嘢
好有恐嚇味道，而且好有阻礙他人發言之意思
至於他人對樓主嘅印象會唔會因為我嘅說話而有改變
我唔知
但最起碼我相信自己 ...

其實我覺得呢，發表己見當然系無問題，不過都要顧及他人，
唔系一句話討論區系比人發表己見就唔使考慮自己言論對他人可能造成既影響，
討論區有甘多人，每個人都會有唔同意見，如果個個都只系想暢所欲言甘發表己見而唔理人地感受，
未免太以自我為中心，甘大家仲點相處呢？

[ 本帖最後由 Trident@KS6946 於 2011-8-9 11:23 編輯 ]

原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-8-9 10:45 發表
拿拿拿，你又錯啦咁
我支持討論區係發表己見嘅地方
但唔代表我會接受用扣分嚟取代文字討論方式
扣分反對異己，呢種可以話係一種非常懦夫嘅行為
既然大家已經有正常嘅討論方式抒發己見
何解要用扣分咁鬼竄去以示自己反對人地意見？
扣分代表乜呢？既然你認為我嘅說話唔啱嘅話
點解唔直接發表自己意見反駁人地？
只識扣分係無助提升討論質素
你亦唔駛諗住quote定我呢句說話，用嚟第日反駁我將來因扣分嘅投訴
因為我一向反對評分制度嚟打壓異己
我認同討論區係可以存在不同意見
但只限於大家回文方式反駁對方論點
而唔係用評分制呢一種小動作去討論
咁嘅討論方法只會對討論區有不良影響

If you think using rating system is timid, thats your own opinion
To me, using rating system means I have opinion towards what you have said
but because of various reasons, I choose rating instead of replying directly.
These reasons can be:
1. You have mentioned the similar issue before, I have conuter-argued you and you did it again
2. Like what you have said, your argument is out of topic and if I reply you I am out of topic too
but I still have to let you know my opinion towards your reply

You are always welcome to make complaints if you dont like the rate
I am not going to stop anyone making complaints, or curse anyone complaining rate system as something like "五毛"
but if you think that rate system is a mean to suppressing others' opinion, well, I can only say this is your presupposition. I admit some people may use it to so-call suppress different opinion, and I support you making complaints on them. But for me, I can swear I am not, and the reason I point out is normally like "not respectful", "humiliating others"... This is related to writer's attitude, not his / her belief or opinion...
If I choose reply to give response on your attitude, again, this is out of topic of that thread, so I am sorry in that case rating is more appropriate...

I have no opinion in commenting whether rating system is worth or not, but I can say that without rating system, the conflicts or quarrel will be more intense... This is exactly what happened in italk before having rating system....

I hope you can understand and be more respectful to people you dont have same opinion, like what you have said before. In this thread, your attitude towards the one who posted the picture is not really nice to be frank. The problem of two-tone colour in the picture is not really serious and I dont think it is strong (or even appropriate) reason to support the argument that it is his fault to take that picture and blocked by those people on the road...

[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2011-8-9 11:59 編輯 ]

原帖由 ASV50 於 2011-8-8 23:41 發表

所以希望你，甚至其他人出文回應時唔好亂講野
唔好信口雌黃
影響自己或者其他人就無謂啦

閣下以上言論對他人之言論自由構成妨礙，唯性質輕微，且未見態度惡劣，
因此本人決定向閣下發出「注意」一個。

B3 聯席板主 示

樓主係咪刪左圖？我睇唔到圖

車就幾時都可以影..不過呢張相就可能得呢次機會影到..
on the other side..咁嘅相都比我影到...開心先係呀

原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-8-9 00:42 發表

討論區就係發表己見嘅地方
如果連己見都要就住就住
咁仲有討論區意義？

請你唔好混淆視聽

討論區係發表己見，但要就住就住既
係態度方面既問題
發表己見並唔係不需要理會他人感受既籍口

正如閤下面對面與他人說話時
我相信不會不理會他人感覺吧？

只是討論區有緩衝位
理論上說話可以更圓滑，更顧及他人感受
但同時不代表意見本身要就住就住
只要說話「從心出發」，要咁做絕對不成問題

原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-8-9 00:42 發表

而且你叫我唔好亂講嘢
好有恐嚇味道，而且好有阻礙他人發言之意思
至於他人對樓主嘅印象會唔會因為我嘅說話而有改變
我唔知
但最起碼我相信自己冇咁大嘅影響力
唔會因為我一兩句你認為係亂講嘅說話而對樓主產生壞印象

如果你認為我恐嚇了你
我可以向你說聲「對不起」

但你仍然講得出紅字呢兩句
只係證明你自己仍然未明白言語既威力
未明白討論區係電子時代對人既影響

你講得出紅字呢兩句
代表你認為討論區講既，絕對唔會影響他人
所以先一而再、再而三
強調自己無咁大影響力

但事實上唔係

原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-8-9 00:42  發表

更何況成篇文都只係「你覺得」我嘅說話會影響樓主
我又係咪需要叫你唔好亂講嘢令我嘅說話產生壞影響？

令你有所誤會
我所指是態度方面，而非意見本身