轉載：非原廠牌品車身的E400H

admin26 的通告是應本人要求代理檢視本標題文章, 以確保執法的中肯性. B5 版的其他文章將不受此臨時安排影響. 多謝各位留意.


B5 版版主
admin15

原帖由 NV58 於 2011-10-29 20:00 發表


If I have the intention to stop you, I would have banned you in the first place, since you are talking non sense and under the definition of "灌水文章", you have already ticked the boxes of 內容空泛 ...

嘩...好大的官威wo
你咁清高就無需要用呢一點黎拋我啦
我又唔係未比人停過

原帖由 sutrak 於 2011-10-29 10:12 發表


真心問: 混能車同柴油車對車身o既要求係點樣"兩回事"呢? 除o左要搵個地方去放Battery Pack 之外仲有乜野要特別留意o既呢?

Thanks!

呢個地方點放..淨係呢點都要同原廠相討啦...特別是呢一種咁新近出現響巴士的電池組
有d野..常識推出黎架o者

原帖由 S3N92 於 2011-10-29 13:15 發表

呢個地方點放..淨係呢點都要同原廠相討啦...特別是呢一種咁新近出現響巴士的電池組
有d野..常識推出黎架o者

Of course body and chassis builders have to work together, but it's not like battary packs have not been fitted on a bus before (I don't mean the standard battery unit of course) - We have already seen the likes of Wright Gemini HEV, Electrocity, Designline, the original E200H and a number of products across the Atlantic something like 5-10 years before the E400H ever turns up. The fact is battery packs nowadays, particularly Li-ion batteries, are much more compact units that the technical challenge of fitting it on a bus is no worse than fitting an air-cond unit on it.

Unless you think fitting a battery pack on a bus is like fitting a nuclear power station on it (and which ironically, has been done and are on the road as well), then all I can say is your interpretation of knowledge, or the lack of it, is fatally flaw.

原帖由 NV58 於 2011-10-29 23:34 發表


Of course body and chassis builders have to work together, but it's not like battary packs have not been fitted on a bus before (I don't mean the standard battery unit of course) - We have already s ...

又係閣下一向的做法
唔同意的人你就曲解其意思繼而極端化

原帖由 S3N92 於 2011-10-29 16:27 發表

又係閣下一向的做法
唔同意的人你就曲解其意思繼而極端化

Yes, and if you are so convinced with what you think is correct, why not spelling it out rationally to disprove my points, or at the absolutely minimum, prove your points are correct? There must be something I am not seeing, other than blind belief, that cause you to have so much conviction to what you think.

Technologically battery packs are battery packs. It has the batteries, control unit, wiring to and from the drivetrain and electricity generator, cooling pack, you name it. And at the end of the day, it's just a subsystem, and as I said, it won't be any different from anything else on a system integration point of view to put on a bus.

I am disputing you not because, out of respect, you as a person. I am disputing you because your points do not stack up, logically and technically from an engineering standpoint. Why would you expect me to agree something that I know, deep down, that is blatantly wrong?

注意: S3N92

閣下#22及#25回文內容完全與本標題無關, 是離題.
現判注意一個.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
另本人認為本標題發展已再沒有討論價值, 部分文章已
達嚴重違規邊緣, 任何人, 包括本版版主NV58, 由即時起,
禁止回文, 本文等同鎖上 (本人未能在本版系統上鎖上)

任何人在此文後再回文將被停版.

本人會要求站長鎖文.

admin26
代理版主

[ 本帖最後由 admin26 於 2011-10-30 00:53 編輯 ]