廉航在香港有發圍嗎?!

廉航Budget Airline在美歐大行其道
東南亞亦開始穩步發展
如新加坡Jetstar Asia,
馬來西亞Air Asia等

現時Tiger Air, Air Asia都有班機到澳門,
而且收費比Jet Star Asia香港線要平,
Tiger Air更將開辦深圳,廣州線,
反而香港就得間只聞樓梯響的甘泉航空,
難道香港機場不打算在廉航市場中擴展嗎?!

唔知大家點睇廉航係香港既發展呢?

If HKG want to develop LCC, they have to follow what SIN have done... Building a new terminal building and reduce turn around time... Here are a few problems which have stopped HKG to become a LCC hub...
1) High airport fees reduce attractiveness...
2) Slow turn around... Which is standard for traditional airlines... But not for LCC...

Because of those points... It has made the cost of LCC flying to HKG higher than MFM... Which make them fly to MFM instead of HKG... At the same time, as aircraft only help airlines to earn money while they are in the sky... That means the longer turn around time would make the aircraft have shorter time flying... Which doesnt allow the LCC to maximise their profit that they could receive from an aircraft during a day...
Also, as you could see... Most of the LCC fly to secondary airport in Europe/America... One of the main reason is the time taken from leaving the gate to take off are usually shorter...

原帖由 ksmbh 於 2006-2-26 14:00 發表
廉航Budget Airline在美歐大行其道
東南亞亦開始穩步發展
如新加坡Jetstar Asia,
馬來西亞Air Asia等

現時Tiger Air, Air Asia都有班機到澳門,
而且收費比Jet Star Asia香港線要平,
Tiger Air更將開辦深圳 ...

因為香港唔可能降低收費黎遷就呢航空公司
如果唔係就係變相補貼
以而家亦立角ge使用率黎講
唔侵呢D航空公司玩亦都唔係好傷
所以香港只可以繼續朝高檔ge方向發展

LCC 可以喺一D收費較平既Terminal停泊
好似Glasgow Airport咁, LCC 就停喺一個貨倉式結構的所謂 TERMINAL,
不過每程都係20分鐘TURN AROUND.

以OASIS HK為例，要做HONG KONG BASE 真係會令成本高好多
反而如果D 飛機停放喺珠海機場，停泊費會平一大截。

原帖由 norrislaw 於 2006-2-26 22:39 發表
LCC 可以喺一D收費較平既Terminal停泊
好似Glasgow Airport咁, LCC 就停喺一個貨倉式結構的所謂 TERMINAL,
不過每程都係20分鐘TURN AROUND.

以OASIS HK為例，要做HONG KONG BASE 真係會令成本高 ...

珠海機場交通太差,
反而深圳機場有得做,
一來有深圳自己乘客源,
地鐵通機場後羅湖唔駛轉車就到,
機票夠平新界鐵路線班客都吸得到.

原帖由 ksmbh 於 2006-2-26 22:49 發表


珠海機場交通太差,
反而深圳機場有得做,
一來有深圳自己乘客源,
地鐵通機場後羅湖唔駛轉車就到,
機票夠平新界鐵路線班客都吸得到.

唔係呀, 我既意思係d 飛機泊珠海, 出發先至飛香港咁樣。

原帖由 norrislaw 於 2006-2-27 00:09 發表


唔係呀, 我既意思係d 飛機泊珠海, 出發先至飛香港咁樣。

油錢都唔少喎,而且咁樣慳唔倒幾多錢,
一樣要比埋位費

香港機場唔係唔受 LCC, but 香港機場有無需要事事遷就 LCC 呢?
做 20 min turnaround, 唔係一定要一座 separate 的 terminal,或者特別設計的泊位
美國著名的 Southwest Airlines 都係在同其他公司一樣的設備下做到 15 min turnaround
而 Southwest 都唔係全部用D次要機場,佢弟大部份都用主要機場,同其他主要航空公司競爭

同埋大家唔好忘記,方便,直接飛到主要機場係可以成為收一個 Premium 的理由
而且香港有不少旅客係商務客,佢弟都係開公司數而已,錢係較次要的一個 Point (少住大來呀)

同埋想問:坐 Tiger Air + 香港-澳門 船飛 到中環 Total 要幾錢? 坐Jet Satr Asia 或 SQ or CX 直到香港再坐機鐵到中環要幾錢? 同埋要幾耐?
(時間同金錢都係影響客人選航班的理由)

turnaround 係咪指landing-落客-上油-上客-take off 呢一連串的步驟?

原帖由 Octavian 於 2006-2-27 04:12 發表
turnaround 係咪指landing-落客-上油-上客-take off 呢一連串的步驟?

差唔多喇,仲有上油既同時仲有上餐~~