原帖由 wingho_cwh 於 2015-9-15 13:37 發表 
但係咁喎，呢個本身真係一個唔合理既無賴規定黎架喎
水係人維持生命所必需
另外就係台北捷運既問題，台北捷運根本就唔係唔畀飲水，根據網上網誌[1]，該網民指出「當時我在台灣旅遊，在台北某捷運站內看見一台飲水機」，換句話講 ...
合唔合理/無賴規定你都要先守，再從其他方法推翻
印象中飲水機係閘外，某D網誌亦話係閘外，
不過重點係「車箱及月台」係不准飲水呢點無錯！
[ 本帖最後由 waterboy1984 於 2015-9-15 14:07 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 053h4 於 2015-9-15 15:03 發表
法例就同廣告有分別, 正常合理的人都知Beverage 係唔包水
港鐵代表人無受專業訓練亂開告票就係佢地唔啱
如果乘客口渴，唔舒服你一定要俾佢飲水
因為係人道理由
茶同可樂就一定唔可以飲
食野更加唔得
其實每個站做法唔同
沙田，火炭，大學係唔俾當值期間飲水
九龍塘就只可以係指定位置飲水
我見過九龍塘有個月台助理當值期間偷偷地飲水 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 053h4 於 2015-9-15 15:03 發表
法例就同廣告有分別, 正常合理的人都知Beverage 係唔包水
港鐵代表人無受專業訓練亂開告票就係佢地唔啱
從來都無用Beverage呢個字，而係用Drinking！
規拒係死，人係生，佢唔俾你飲係合理，你可以唔當住職員佢面飲！
你偷雞飲啖清水無咩人會話你，
尤其係車箱，司機用CAM，成7-12卡真係好難睇到你，想捉都難啦！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
回復 15# 的帖子
Cap 556B Mass Transit Railway By-laws
"Bylaw: 27 Prohibition on taking certain luggage, etc. and consumption of food or beverage
No person shall-
(a) bring into or upon the railway premises any luggage, article or other thing which cannot be carried or
otherwise accommodated on the railway without risk of injury to any person or damage to any railway
property or without causing a nuisance or inconvenience to other persons using the railway; or
(b) consume or attempt to consume any food or beverage (whether alcoholic or non-alcoholic) within the
paid area (except any train for the carriage of passengers to Hong Kong from any other part of China
or vice versa by the Corporation or by third parties)."
請問版友你究竟有沒有先看過附例才發表意見？ |
|
|
Flickr Photos: Hongkonger's Collection
|
|
|
|
|
|
del~~~
[ 本帖最後由 busfunfun 於 2015-9-15 23:08 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Hongkonger 於 2015-9-15 18:49 發表
Cap 556B Mass Transit Railway By-laws
"Bylaw: 27 Prohibition on taking certain luggage, etc. and consumption of food or beverage
No person shall-
(a) bring into or upon the railway premises any lugga ...
Sorry, 太多字所以無去查
好奇一問，附例有無地方「白紙黑字」寫到明beverage係exclude water呢？
或者可能要搵人司法覆核去推翻...
[ 本帖最後由 waterboy1984 於 2015-9-16 16:05 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
