Just a couple of questions:
1. Why are there so many nay-sayers over the possibility of more usage of all-electric buses in Hong Kong? Are electric buses uniquely unsuitable for use here?
2. Why are people in this board, and especially at the associated FB page so terrified by the prospect of more Chinese-made buses being operated here? As faras I know, the Chinese actually has some of the more mature electric vehicle technology in the world.
Sorry for posting in English, as I am unable to type in Chinese on my laptop.
053h4 發表於 2021-5-22 12:54
因為碳中和係世界趨勢, 而碳中程主要係人均的碳消耗可以被自然植林之類吸收的碳所抵銷
而電力可以用非石 ...
Actually, I am asking about why so many at this board don't think all-electric buses will be successful in Hong Kong. Thanks!
Didn't realize 053h4 has already answered my question 1. Admin please delete my last post. Thanks!
本帖最後由 b123as 於 2021-5-22 19:19 編輯
其實只要非繁（9-16，20-尾班）出過海巴士雙向分段，港島區有過海線重置的巴士線只在繁忙時間服務，非繁一半以上有過海線可替代港島區巴士線，可以唔需要出車以節省成本。
b123as 發表於 2021-5-22 19:18
其實只要非繁（9-16，20-尾班）出過海巴士雙向分段，港島區有過海線重置的巴士線只在繁忙時間服務，非繁一 ...
港島地區人士唔BUY
一班5B特車都搞成咁
914比個分段
又話914去唔到堅尼地城;P
kay 發表於 2021-5-22 19:40
港島地區人士唔BUY
一班5B特車都搞成咁
堅尼地城咪有5X囉。又，幾多人要係大坑去堅尼地城啊
b123as 發表於 2021-5-22 19:18
其實只要非繁（9-16，20-尾班）出過海巴士雙向分段，港島區有過海線重置的巴士線只在繁忙時間服務，非繁一 ...
過海巴士喺港島區出雙向分段分段，如果係聯營線會令九巴得益