原帖由 EF107 於 2011-10-29 00:04 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但LG1200 前身 6LXDT 就好強勁...
LG1200在香港係得AD53同AD56用275匹呢款, 動力同6LXDT差唔多, 但利蘭同密龍用嘅係230匹版本, 頂多比6LXCT大力少少.
原帖由 EF107 於 29/10/2011 00:04 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但LG1200 前身 6LXDT 就好強勁...
香港用過 6LXDT 既好似只係得 S3M145 同埋 M21 :o
原帖由 牛奶仔 於 2011-10-29 01:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
邊個話cc大就一定大食? 依你咁講, NL262一定大食過好多三軸雙層車, 話晒都11970cc, TD豪得9603cc, 係咪又好慳油?
LG1200比LT10慳油, 因為佢低轉扭力大, 坐過開龍或嗰兩部AD都覺得佢起圍比L10快, 可惜只係成日無零 ...
我只係知以前AD53同56行73X成日比人話快過其他車用晒D油,
我唔知數據,我剩係知佢地實際應用姐
[ 本帖最後由 Oliver_ME16 於 2011-10-29 18:11 編輯 ]
原帖由 Oliver_ME16 於 2011-10-29 18:09 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
我只係知以前AD53同56行73X成日比人話快過其他車用晒D油,
我唔知數據,我剩係知佢地實際應用姐
如果只講低轉可能真係慳到油 (彌敦流水線？)，又如果成日用高轉去跑公路，係咪會比其他偈用多o左油呢？
:lol
原帖由 DGCNYO 於 2011-10-26 06:08 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
車身補強之說，更加奇怪，其實這說法只不過對3軸車說，這結構2個軸短車跟本無 ...
FS1819 is actually correct. The Olympian (and Metrobus) is a semi-integral design and has to rely on the bodywork to provide structural strength. Without the body, the chassis will not be strong enough to stand on its own and will buckle and collapse.
If this sounds dodgy, actually all low-floor chassis you see nowadays are built to the same semi-integral design concept. The light weight benefit outweighs the need of an excessively heavy and stronger chassis.
原帖由 牛奶仔 於 2011-10-29 01:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
邊個話cc大就一定大食? 依你咁講, NL262一定大食過好多三軸雙層車, 話晒都11970cc, TD豪得9603cc, 係咪又好慳油?
LG1200比LT10慳油, 因為佢低轉扭力大, 坐過開龍或嗰兩部AD都覺得佢起圍比L10快, 可惜只係成日無零 ... 3波密龍至係吉偈喎 :lol
都係威起步o個幾秒
換左偈之後批密龍中段d力 越去越有 係極速同以前一樣唔高
原帖由 TankKingEH9697 於 2011-10-29 21:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
3波密龍至係吉偈喎 :lol
都係威起步o個幾秒
換左偈之後批密龍中段d力 越去越有 係極速同以前一樣唔高
吉偈密龍同普通吉偈龍上斜力水唔係差太遠
坐過行42C 坐滿人，企幾個
一波慢慢碌上青公
俾3AV 推上斜 :L