Well, Sammi Siu Yee is one of the "Golden Eggs" of CRHK, if they lose them, then their commercial and listenership will be down...(i hope they learn their lesson from the firing of the Talk show hosts)
原帖由 UCR683 於 2006-6-6 18:15 發表
現在要關注的是,商台的《架勢堂》,會否受到壓力而停播,改以另一節目替代。 |
|
|
|
|
But I thought under the 12-2 slot, it's not illegal for these word to use, I remember @ Wa Wa Wa era, Chapman and Sandra did said something similar too.
原帖由 limited 於 2006-6-6 21:47 發表
我諗又唔會去到呢個地步o既
最多要求個節目要 "PG 家長指引"
(就算o係 12-2 做都會有 under 18 o既聽)
廣管局出 Warning 亦應該係預期之內的事
但再有下一次就唔敢包... |
|
|
|
|
I always think, maybe there's need to be a media regulatory board (on printed media) in order to save from having inaccurate news story (btw, how come HK artist never use defament lawsuit to deal with such issue, in alot of Western Countries and places like Taiwan, singapore, reports that are too out of hand can be sue.)
原帖由 GT40 於 2006-6-7 04:10 發表
現時又未正式作出裁決,某就用全民公審的方式,
把自己處於道德的高地來肆意把不同的意見打成反道德,
即使有理也不見得公義吧。再講,把這次的不當說成
侮辱女性,和一個白人打黑人就等同種族歧視同樣是謬誤,
一些 ... |
|
|
|
|
But I heard from Ta Ta Ta, the one that received most of the vote is 小儀 bor.... |
|
|
|
|
政府應該以嚴肅角度處理呢個話題,非禮呢樣野唔係講下笑就係。 |
|
抵制家樂福‧打倒妖僧達賴
|
|
|
原帖由 art0925 於 2006-6-7 05:12 發表
I always think, maybe there's need to be a media regulatory board (on printed media) in order to save from having inaccurate news story (btw, how come HK artist never use defament lawsuit to deal with such issue, in alot of Western Countries and places like Taiwan, singapore, reports that are too out of hand can be sue.)
For newspaper, there was already similar idea to you issued to public several years ago.
However, the printed media STRONGLY OBJECTED to the idea while the general public
support over this. The media opposed this idea since in their opinion, it would adversely
affect "freedom of speech".
For defamation, it is hard to use this to against the media especially on English Laws.
The case Albert Cheng vs Tse Wai Chun shown that, once the media is proved to be
"fairly comment" one's affair, the one who being affected has no ground to sue. |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 art0925 於 2006-6-7 05:14 發表
But I heard from Ta Ta Ta, the one that received most of the vote is 小儀 bor....
I doubt the fairness of the result.... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 pakchi70 於 2006-6-7 00:43 發表
根本男女有別
平乜鬼等
我睇過一篇文章
佢舉出個有趣例子
同女朋友食飯(或者任何女仕)
女仕心情好時就話AA制扮晒男女平等
唔開心時要你請就應份的
咁都叫公平?
根本這個世界上是沒有什麼嚴格的男女平等.
若真的要男女平等,紀律部隊如警察,應該如消防處般,
統一招聘標準才對.為何女性的應聘標準可以低一些?
曾經有一段新聞,說有投考消防隊長的女應徵者,
建議消防處應該降低女性投考標準,以便更多女性可以加入消防處.
但為消防處拒絕.本人對消防處堅持統一標準感到高興!
套用一個笑話,難道賊人見到女警,會跑慢一點? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 pakchi70 於 2006-6-7 00:08 發表
無錯
我都覺得會咁樣
又唔見港男做到好似舞男show咁會有人投訴
就算有人投訴都不見得迴響會好似呢件事咁大
根本就係啲女權份子化大件事
沒錯,之前招募港男女性評判團的廣告,
哪句"從來男人o既價值都由女性o黎決定"
都已經係有問題啦,又唔見有人投訴,但我相信
如果換轉呢句變成"從來女人o既價值都由男性o黎決定"
o黎宣傳港姐,d女權份子一定又會走出o黎去
tvb抗議話呢句貶低女性形象.....
[ 本帖最後由 nelson 於 2006-6-7 16:13 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|