原帖由 Eddie 於 2006-11-29 01:22 發表
去石硤尾搭86比較正路
Yes and most expensive as well...
In the morning, the demand for 82M is much lower as people would want to get to work as quickly as possible to allow more sleep at home... So now with KCR at Sha Kok and Pok Hong Estate, people would rather take KCR... And for peole from Sha Tin Wai, 82M have a frequency of every 22mins, unless you travel on it everyday... Otherwise its not easy to find out what time to bus arrive...
But in evening, the demand for 82M seems better as people are tired so they rather take the bus and get nearier to their home than KCR... So usually with a higher frequency of 82M during the evening, there could be up to around 100 passenger each services... And the queue do get pretty long within quite a short while...
Also, since going by KCR, there is a longer walk while change at Tai Wai when they go back to Sha Tin Wai and area while going out to Kowloon, the change is more less complicated and not involve getting up and down stairs... So for 82M, the evening demand is much heavier... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Gary_B 於 2006-11-29 01:13 發表
沙角乙明博康如果轉地鐵,大把車選擇,85A 出樂富,89B 出黃大仙 / 九龍灣都得,使乜呆等 82M。
85A同82M/S 班次冇咩分別, 唔好見佢有22分就以為要呆等, 果段時間有條82S, 82S客量算唔錯
去香港九龍西面冇咩理由要搭89B轉地鐵 |
|
GK9636@ATENVIRO
|
|
|
原帖由 GK9636 於 2006-11-29 13:38 發表
85A同82M/S 班次冇咩分別, 唔好見佢有22分就以為要呆等, 果段時間有條82S, 82S客量算唔錯
去香港九龍西面冇咩理由要搭89B轉地鐵
咁又令我想起另一條問題...
取消82M,82S有得留低? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 石頭 於 2006-11-29 20:36 發表
咁又令我想起另一條問題...
取消82M,82S有得留低?
咁講真,究竟九巴同運輸署係咪真係考慮緊取消82M?
根本無人知
我一直覺得呢件事只係「ABC討論區」某D人既suggestion...
(睇返開文者的陳述) |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 petcity 於 2006-11-29 21:21 發表
的當據聞有關建議已經提交有關方面研究,如果冇任何反對
好快實行
我敢說肯定有人反對
第一個嘈肯定係「成功爭取開辦286P」的那個區議員
爭在TD同九巴做唔做落去者 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 alexero 於 2006-11-29 22:16 發表
我敢說肯定有人反對
第一個嘈肯定係「成功爭取開辦286P」的那個區議員
爭在TD同九巴做唔做落去者
如果那尊貴區議員「成功爭取保留82M」, 最後結果同「成功爭取多線一齊cut車」冇咩分別 |
|
GK9636@ATENVIRO
|
|
|
原帖由 petcity 於 2006-11-29 21:21 發表
的當據聞有關建議已經提交有關方面研究,如果冇任何反對
好快實行
如果成事,82S既命運會係點?取消?保留?未有定案? |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|