Why does MTR want to use battery on a line (or which on their entire network are all) consist of overhead wire? Using battery long term is not the way to go. And unless theres a power outage (which is rarely the case) its not necessary for a train to save itself.
為什麼港鐵要在由架空線組成的線路(或整個網路上全部)上使用電池?長期使用電池並不是一個好的方法。除非發生停電(這種情況很少發生),否則火車沒有必要自救。 |
|
|
|
|
呢D車應該都係間廠跟香港設計整好大部份硬件裝置,到小濠灣先會再裝埋D裝飾品上去。務求你流出都唔可能係最終極版本 |
|
|
|
|
Ludwig 發表於 2024-4-12 01:00
Why does MTR want to use battery on a line (or which on their entire network are all) consist of ove ...
可能舖路引入“雲巴”🤭
Probably paving the way for introduction of "SkyShuttle", battery-powered overhead light rail by BYD |
|
|
|
|
我只係希望A271,A279,A285三代車用嚟俾紫線加車做全日1+1方案,費時一陣環保大道堆樓落成時區運吉借機俾屎水大搞790,690S的服務搶因爲將軍澳鐵路服務長期不思進取下跌出嚟的客.
|
|
|
|
|
車廂的裝飾﹐根本無需擔心。
M公司提供什麼圖紙﹐用什麼物料﹐車廠咪照去做囉。
現時的M車﹐當年都係要同迪迪尼商討﹐大家覺得OK才去做裝飾。
|
|
|
|
|
本帖最後由 hellomato 於 2024-4-12 14:49 編輯
車廂設計很簡單:將老鼠車嘅則俾青島,照住係Q-Train嘅則上面改就得
至於轉埋系統,話唔定係為輕鐵改造做鋪墊——
1. 輕鐵想玩氫動力,其實都係電池車嘅一種(伏筆:想拆架空電纜供電)
2. 輕鐵都講過要轉訊號系統
但係輕鐵線路繁多,不如先搵另一條結構簡單嘅線
試水新系統嘅基礎穩定性,用迪士尼線似乎就剛剛好
*同雲巴反而無太大關係,因為BYD應該會搞埋雲巴嘅信號系統;而且就算引入香港,都唔一定俾港鐵營運。 |
|
我是一部小小MMC~~~~
|
|
|
老鼠鐵路入座率等於紅線的30%一鋪過換曬影響唔大,最多每日提早尾車延長開頭車時間其餘時間就俾兩巴增加B5入米奇老鼠樂園的時間和加強R8班次就可以足夠能力做曬換車換訊號安排.
|
|
|
|
|
HU6455 發表於 2024-4-12 15:36
又係車同信號一齊換,見過鬼仲未怕黑?
搞唔掂最多咪用住舊車舊系統先 又唔似SACEM趕住換 |
|
|
|
|
Ludwig 發表於 2024-4-12 01:00
Why does MTR want to use battery on a line (or which on their entire network are all) consist of ove ...
用電池加載車咪再爆2022年4月嗰單都行得囉。
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|