回復 45# 的帖子
如果住青衣南，搭巴士同地鐵都係要企，點解唔948一程過，仲要轉黎轉去?
如果時間唔係爭太遠，兩都唔係太大分別 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
綜合一下...（大致）
- 大家普遍支持49X不停荃灣, 而一定要補返荃灣楊屋道至沙田的服務(並最好似49X般特快, 不經和宜合道)
- 都認為42C最好可不經大窩口, 或40P全日去幫輕42C, 但都機會好微.
- 在地鐵和948服務的吸引力有些少爭論, 但都認為青南/山上的部分, 948是比249M+地鐵更方便的來往港島
- 甚至提出地鐵應加密班次
- 認為地鐵站和很多屋苑有相當距離．
(還有的請加上去)
我認為加地鐵班次是低可能的, 同機鐵又要夾班次,
或除非毎車變成5卡... 好複雜...
To 板 小小話...
當想想我們自己在討論區的角色, 我們生活上, 尤其學校氣氛上很容易會用很多現實的限制(constraint)去推翻一些較富創意性的建議. 首先搞清楚: 一, 同不同意該建議方向, 然後 二, 才說可行上問題上有什麼困難, 這樣的討論可更smooth.
在巴士方面, 係, 一定會有議員可能嘈, 或有人(有理or無理反對), 或者呢度'無坑'做總站, 車輛調配等現實的限制. 但不是不可調整的, 只要如果對社會好的. 而不希望用現實的限制去潑熄改善/變的方法. 那些限制, 有一些可以對抗的. 例如, 據說98C在美孚條坑都是特別加出來的.
我們究竟: A) 反正美孚無位, 將軍澳就無車去西九龍算了, 還是B) 說清楚將軍澳至西九龍的需求, 看有無附近總站, 或者一齊支持美孚開新坑, (if practical).
我們是可以帶出我們的觀察, 建議，有可能議員/相關組織是看到我們的建議, 而且有人支持的. (未必次次係) 或者有一日真是會帶來改變. (以往有無往史是討論區間接影響現實呢?)
現實限制唔係話唔顧, 但不要被它bound死. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2008-10-1 13:15 發表 
At least you get a seat when you 等開車. Why that guy prefer 等車 to 等開車??
I can't get what you mean. Do you mean not many people actually use TCL to go to the city??
If so, I can't agree with ...
The guy said that he did not want to wait, whatever for the car's arrival and departure.
Typing mistake...sorry about that
Your guest is right, but I don't agree with you. Where the Tsing Yi citizens go are usually Tsuen Wan, Kwai Fong, Sha Tin, Kowloon, Mainland China and Hong Kong Island.
Please see which of these connections requires Tung Chung Line. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 HF3204@243M 於 2008-10-1 17:24 發表
Your guest is right, but I don't agree with you. Where the Tsing Yicitizens go are usually Tsuen Wan, Kwai Fong, Sha Tin, Kowloon,Mainland China and Hong Kong Island.
; x9 M" a2 n/ P" Yhkitalk.netPlease see which of these connections requires Tung Chung Line.
TCL targets at people who go to Kowloon and HK Island.
TCL owns a high share in this target group, especially for Tsing Yi North.
Places outside TCL's target are not relevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2008-10-1 18:42 發表
TCL targets at people who go to Kowloon and HK Island.
TCL owns a high share in this target group, especially for Tsing Yi North.
Places outside TCL's target are not relevant.
But is it a problem while not all of the Tsing Yi citizens are utilizing TCL, TD asks them to use as much as possible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 ming03 於 2008-10-1 11:47 發表
948 又唔會塞車o既
948 服務時間東涌線 4 分鐘一班
你居然可以講等得黎d 時間都o係返哂度?
青衣過香港 15 分鐘內攪掂
948 得泮
你又想淨係計車程?
淨係計車程實快架, 但有意思咩?
香港指邊度?
中環? 銅鑼灣?
我係匯豐搭地鐵都要半個鐘先係青衣落得到車.
如果架車一直等人的話十五一定唔得..
[ 本帖最後由 張偉沖 於 2008-10-1 20:58 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 ming03 於 2008-10-1 11:53 發表
948 又唔會塞車o既?
948 服務時間果陣東涌線 4 分鐘一班
你居然可以話等得黎時間都o係返哂度o既
青衣過香港 15 分鐘之內一定攪掂
948 開o左車 15 分鐘又可以去到邊?
完全唔明d人d 時間可以多到咁去搭巴士o既
時間 ...
TD 不嬲都低估948 的客量啦, 你唔知咩.
TD 阻頭阻勢,
明明尾站永遠上唔晒班客一架車都唔肯加,
這個又係邊個責任?
邊個限quota 落去? 係巴士公司??
[ 本帖最後由 張偉沖 於 2008-10-1 21:01 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2008-10-1 13:25 發表
For Cheung On Estate or Tsing Yi Estate, most people would rather walk 10 to 15 minutes to take MTR and that's why not many passengers in Tsing Yi North use 948.
But for Tsing Yi South, 948 is actu ...
948 係長發可以上二十個或者更多,
部車去到青衣南可以講係無位淨. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2008-10-1 18:42 發表
TCL targets at people who go to Kowloon and HK Island.
TCL owns a high share in this target group, especially for Tsing Yi North.
Places outside TCL's target are not relevant.
因為無競爭,
基本上它係獨市生意,
owns a high share 一點都不出奇. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abusing dead rule -> Denial of reality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
樓主
