取消70 開辦270B 清河來往佐敦道(匯翔道)
[複製鏈接]
|
都可以做得落既
至少時間固定 , d 人都易等 d
呢個分鐘 , 比之前既 70 好好多 |
|
|
要針對ADL呢間如此垃圾既車廠，理由唔需要多
|
|
|
|
|
|
九龍區的定線遲d再諗 新界區已更新
[ 本帖最後由 tonytsang_hk 於 2008-11-17 00:02 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
請問是否
清河-->兜清河一個圈-->太平出面-->掃管埔-->馬適路-->聯和墟-->新運路-->華明巴總-->一鳴路-->大窩西支路?
我覺得唔洗兜華明了,加273轉乘可能好D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
想係華明搞轉乘70k麻
至於點行 請睇我第一個post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is a good idea since the line is already overlaped with 70K
273 and 273A are more frequent compare with 70K
and I think that it is better for the 270B not via Jockey Club Road since the 70K has already via.
I would suggest that the 270B will via Ma Sik Road to LWH and have a exchange with 70K in Fanling Town Centre, a interchange of 273/273A in Fanling MTR[more prefer]/Cheung Wah Estate.
The thing about you interchange suggestion of 70K: I think it is better to make it Fanling Centre-->Wah Ming and Jockey Club Road-->Fanling
But I still suggest not to via the Tai Wo West Service Road except the special buses at peak hour.
We may convince the Tai Po District Council by a cheaper interchange price.
We can provide a 2.9-3.7 interchange offer for 73 and 271 which the total fee will be lowered by 0.7-1.5
Suggested interchange:
273/273A/273B<-->270B :3.2-3.7 deduction
70K<-->270B: free interchange
270B<--> 78K,79K,73K: 3.7 deduction
[ 本帖最後由 hkstudent 於 2008-11-20 20:41 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 hkstudent 於 2008-11-18 19:31 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
I don't think it is a good idea since the line is already overlaped with 70K
273 and 273A are more frequent compare with 70K
and I think that it is better for the 270B not via Jockey Club Road since ...
唔經大窩西支路的話 呢個建議流產的機會頗高 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
但係有個問題就係,
經左大窩西之後,比鐵路差不多同價的巴士,以比鐵路慢的程度行駛的話,有多少人會乘呢?
我相信一個更便宜的轉乘車費(73-->271平 0.7-1.5)將使大埔區屈服
還有,上水區的站略為不足,
同時,以清河附近居民的立場來看,在清河兜一個圈會較為方便(當然,要在保健路另外設新站,免得要特意進入太平巴總),
再進一步,其實可否兜過去彩園路呢?
可以方便上水市中心的居民(這個其實可以用273B轉乘代替)
[ 本帖最後由 hkstudent 於 2008-11-20 20:40 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 hkstudent 於 2008-11-20 20:30 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但係有個問題就係,
經左大窩西之後,比鐵路差不多同價的巴士,以比鐵路慢的程度行駛的話,有多少人會乘呢?
我相信一個更便宜的轉乘車費(73-->271平 0.7-1.5)將使大埔區屈服
還有,上水區的站略為不足,
同時,以清河附近居民的立場來看,在清河兜一個圈會較為方便(當然,要在保健路另外設新站,免得要特意進入太平巴總),
再進一步,其實可否兜過去彩園路呢?
可以方便上水市中心的居民(這個其實可以用273B轉乘代替)
與其係保健路整個新站 , 倒不如入太平好過
另外 , 條線唔行大窩西 , 咁你認為仲可以做到幾多客
仲有 , 原本上水果邊 , 其實可以用番 70K / 273A 做轉乘好過 |
|
|
要針對ADL呢間如此垃圾既車廠，理由唔需要多
|
|
|
|
|
|
我諗行大窩西支路點都好過遊上水gei
同埋可以吸引到部分小巴轉乘港鐵的乘客
你所指的比鐵路慢，到底是慢幾多秒？ 本來這線如何也是比鐵路慢，
只是我所強調的是為遠離鐵路站的乘客提供點對點的服務，如果純車程比鐵路慢10-15分鐘，本人認為這路線仍有吸引力。
只要這路線的乘座率是70號的兩倍 已經是有所交待 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
樓主
