我都唔明點解政府話巴士唔環保

原帖由 Alvin2002 於 2009-5-16 17:46 發表
既然你都識講東鐵本地線都係蝕錢, 你認為港鐵肯為羅湖/落馬洲線減價既同時, 又肯維持本地線收費?
影響到佢而家既得利益喎.

The fare of the cross-boundary service of East Rail Line is business-related.
Transport cost of $50 for a business trip is nothing for a trading company.

The fare of the local service of  East Rail Line is livelihood-related.
Little rise in transport cost for daily commutes is going to hit people hard.

For those who choose to live in Shenzhen but work in Hong Kong everyday, they should have taken the transport cost into account before they made the decision to live in Shenzhen.

原帖由 053h4 於 2009-5-16 17:26 發表


你以為深圳銷費平, 食野平嗎?
事實上, 羅湖定價高還是低, 對新界北的零售飲食影響根本有限
難道落街食飯的人, 會來回用成個鐘, 去深圳食餐飯? 車費點平, 都補唔番條數

而所謂變相的離境稅, 根本只是借口
從來官 ...

d人梗係唔會專程北上食餐飯啦
但係大陸有好多消費活動係香港搵唔到架(大家心照有d咩啦)
如果北上成本平左
d人自然會多左去呢d消費
連帶食飯買野都係大陸做埋

港鐵當然唔會...
得罪一班人好定得罪成堆人好?
大家都心中有數

站友違規通告 (ID=city_alexander)

網　　址：我都唔明點解政府話巴士唔環保
分　　板：B2
回文編號：#9
涉案站友：ID=city_alexander
違犯站規：站規第34A(b)條
理　　由：使用粗口諧音
判　　決：暫停貼文權30日
備　　註：不適用


B2板板主

根據03年政府文件(http://www3.news.gov.hk/ISD/ebul ... l/030312tc06001.htm)及02年區議會文件(www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/north_d/chinese/doc/TTm15.doc) , 東鐵本地線大部份時間都係虧蝕, 至於輕鐵每年甚至蝕超過1億. 若果閣下認為過境線收費太貴, 咁係唔係想佢個收費標準同本地線睇齊? 東鐵本地線同輕鐵長年虧蝕, 係唔係想佢因為唔駛用過境線補貼而加價以便收支平衡(唔係賺錢)?
九鐵(唔係而家睇錢份上既港鐵)一向都好清楚表達, 佢地係靠過境線同物業收益黎補貼其他服務, 何況而家港鐵又要承擔埋西鐵營運(西鐵線而家有冇錢賺?) 要港鐵減過境線車費, 佢一定價加返本地線車費做彌補. 兩害取其輕, 寧願佢唔好加本地線車費而每日影響超過100萬人.

P.S. 好似已經傾到超出本版範圍.

拆過去R1版啦