原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-25 16:41 發表 
Sure I don't get your mean as your English is quite difficult to understand,
can you use Chinese to explain that to us once more?Thank you very much.
By the way, there is no such word spelling as 'pr ...
sorry~ couldnt type chinese for a couple of days...
and obviously "proove" was a typo, should have been "prove"
anyway~
seems to me~ you read english just fine, so i will try explain it again
timeline: just an example, not the exact date or time
day 1 -> day 15 -> current
if A is proven to be B at day 1 base on the fact occur on day 1.
it will be a logically incorrect, to prove A = B at day 15 base on the fact occur on day 15.
all we can say is that at day 15 & current time is: A=B at day 1
things occured at day 15 is irrelevant...
hope this makes sense... |
|
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
|
|
|
Seems I finally get your mean, are you saying that things happen on day 1 isn't means that are aslo happen on future days? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-25 21:41 發表 
Seems I finally get your mean, are you saying that things happen on day 1 isn't means that are aslo happen on future days?
correct, I am fine with people praising ME's performance when they ran the 68 series.
(of course, I do feel bad that S3V, S3BL, and S3N were mostly ignored)
but come on, be realistic, when ME went to Sheung Shui, we got to admit they were not as good as before.
when i hear crap like how fast their run on tolo highway, flying on tai po road, going 120 km/h down hill
I really wonder if these people know what they are talking about...
(I do know there a certain ME were still running like crazy, but how could that speak for the entire fleet??)
And that's what I meant in #1... |
|
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
|
|
|
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-25 22:08 發表 
correct, I am fine with people praising ME's performance when they ran the 68 series.
(of course, I do feel bad that S3V, S3BL, and S3N were mostly ignored)
but come on, be realistic, when ME went t ...
整體上黎講,我明白而且認同你的見解。只是我對d師兄用設計新佢成三十年既車同佢比頗為反感
[ 本帖最後由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-26 17:34 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
|
|
|
原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-26 17:29 發表 
整體上黎講,我明白而且認同你的見解。只是我對d師兄用設計新佢成三十年既車同佢比頗為反感
I appreciate your understanding, but you dont have to agree with me~
It is what it is~ If there are logics behind, I am open to any thoughts.
care less for nonsense, emotional discussion~
[ 本帖最後由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-26 23:02 編輯 ] |
|
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
|
|
|
ME37 行 63x 行100km 都唔係晚年? 2002 年 wor?
一架已經可以反映到, 只要九巴唔淹, 批 ME係可以好快既
我都鐘意批車, 不過臨退真係好多部都唔多掂 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|