hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

用戶名  找回密碼
 會員申請加入


(B0)香港巴士車務及車廂設備 (B1)香港巴士廣告消息/廣告車行踪 (B2)香港巴士討論 [熱門] [精華] (B3)巴士攝影作品貼圖區 [熱門] [精華] (B3i)即拍即貼 -手機相&翻拍Mon相 (B4)兩岸三地巴士討論 [精華] (B5)外地巴士討論 [精華]

Advertisement


(B6)旅遊巴士及過境巴士 [精華] (B7)巴士特別所見 (B11)巴士精華區 (B22)巴士迷吹水區   (V)私家車,商用車,政府及特種車輛 [精華]
(A6)相片及短片分享/攝影技術 (A10)香港地方討論 [精華] (A11)消費著數及飲食資訊 (A16)建築物機電裝置及設備 (A19)問路專區 (N)其他討論題目  
(F1)交通路線建議 (C2)航空 [精華] (C3)海上交通及船隻 [精華] (D1)公共交通有關商品 [精華]   (Y)hkitalk.net會員福利部 (Z)站務資源中心
(R1)香港鐵路 [精華] (R2)香港電車 [精華] (R3)港外鐵路 [精華]   (O1)omsi討論區 (O2)omsi下載區 (O3)omsi教學及求助區
(M1)小型巴士綜合討論 (M2)小型巴士多媒體分享區 (M3)香港小型巴士字軌表        
 

Advertisement

 

hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網»論壇 (B) Bus 巴士討論區 巴士攝影作品貼圖區 (B3) ME @ 70X / 71K
開啟左側

ME @ 70X / 71K

[複製鏈接]
 樓主| dicksonboy 發表於 2010-2-25 17:21 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-25 16:41 發表

Sure I don't get your mean as your English is quite difficult to understand,
can you use Chinese to explain that to us once more?Thank you very much.
By the way, there is no such word spelling as 'pr ...


sorry~ couldnt type chinese for a couple of days...
and obviously "proove" was a typo, should have been "prove"
anyway~
seems to me~ you read english just fine, so i will try explain it again

timeline: just an example, not the exact date or time
day 1 -> day 15 -> current

if A is proven to be B at day 1 base on the fact occur on day 1.
it will be a logically incorrect, to prove A = B at day 15 base on the fact occur on day 15.
all we can say is that at day 15 & current time is: A=B at day 1
things occured at day 15 is irrelevant...
hope this makes sense...
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
chukachunhkac 發表於 2010-2-25 21:41 | 顯示全部樓層
Seems I finally get your mean, are you saying that things happen on day 1 isn't means that are aslo happen on future days?
 樓主| dicksonboy 發表於 2010-2-25 22:08 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-25 21:41 發表
Seems I finally get your mean, are you saying that things happen on day 1 isn't means that are aslo happen on future days?


correct, I am fine with people praising ME's performance when they ran the 68 series.
(of course, I do feel bad that S3V, S3BL, and S3N were mostly ignored)
but come on, be realistic, when ME went to Sheung Shui, we got to admit they were not as good as before.

when i hear crap like how fast their run on tolo highway, flying on tai po road, going 120 km/h down hill
I really wonder if these people know what they are talking about...
(I do know there a certain ME were still running like crazy, but how could that speak for the entire fleet??)
And that's what I meant in #1...
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
卡達哥 發表於 2010-2-26 00:50 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-24 17:33 發表


你都識過喇
球王既名係以前冠冕既
你點可以以佢而家既表現黎肯定佢過去既輝煌?
而家(其實係一直以黎)有人係講ME行上水線戰績如何彪炳
所以係車皇如何如何

正如到今時今日都有人叫3AD牛肺龍
一D都唔公道咯

一剎那 ...


所謂的公道都係你口中姐~
D人話ME係車王,你又唔鐘意;
叫3AD牛肺龍,你又話唔公道。

神又係你鬼又係你,
不過無損見識過ME威力的版友對此車的評價
GA6072 發表於 2010-2-26 15:35 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 卡達哥 於 2010-2-26 00:50 發表


所謂的公道都係你口中姐~
D人話ME係車王,你又唔鐘意;
叫3AD牛肺龍,你又話唔公道。

神又係你鬼又係你,
不過無損見識過ME威力的版友對此車的評價 ...


遲下可能連坡柴都有人平反....
chukachunhkac 發表於 2010-2-26 17:29 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-25 22:08 發表


correct, I am fine with people praising ME's performance when they ran the 68 series.
(of course, I do feel bad that S3V, S3BL, and S3N were mostly ignored)
but come on, be realistic, when ME went t ...

整體上黎講,我明白而且認同你的見解。只是我對d師兄用設計新佢成三十年既車同佢比頗為反感

[ 本帖最後由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-26 17:34 編輯 ]
 樓主| dicksonboy 發表於 2010-2-26 22:56 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 卡達哥 於 2010-2-26 00:50 發表


所謂的公道都係你口中姐~
D人話ME係車王,你又唔鐘意;
叫3AD牛肺龍,你又話唔公道。

神又係你鬼又係你,
不過無損見識過ME威力的版友對此車的評價 ...


ha~
do you see a patten here?

1)In the past, ME's outstanding performance earned "車王" title
The title was kept till they retire even though they couldn't run then.

2) In the past, 3AD'a awful performance earned "牛肺龍" title
The title was kept till today even thought they are much better nowadays

I am logically correct disagreeing both thoughts~
For those who couldnt and wont admit ME suck after they aged, I am sorry that I bursted your bubbles~
a bit sad~
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
 樓主| dicksonboy 發表於 2010-2-26 22:57 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 chukachunhkac 於 2010-2-26 17:29 發表

整體上黎講,我明白而且認同你的見解。只是我對d師兄用設計新佢成三十年既車同佢比頗為反感


I appreciate your understanding, but you dont have to agree with me~
It is what it is~ If there are logics behind, I am open to any thoughts.
care less for nonsense, emotional discussion~

[ 本帖最後由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-26 23:02 編輯 ]
Idiotism is idiots being idiotic
aiisack 發表於 2010-2-26 23:39 | 顯示全部樓層
ME37 行 63x 行100km 都唔係晚年? 2002 年 wor?

一架已經可以反映到, 只要九巴唔淹, 批 ME係可以好快既

我都鐘意批車, 不過臨退真係好多部都唔多掂
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請加入

本版積分規則

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

站規|清理本站Cookies|hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

GMT+8, 2025-6-9 11:56

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表