原帖由 307 於 2006-3-2 09:59 發表
無法子啦...
邊個叫政府只係信柴油唔環保，
而信LPG就等於環保呢?
依家到底成個市場有幾多LPG車揀，
如果俾香港用雙動車、可以有大架一點的的士，
就算係車租貴一點，
我相信都會有司機願 ...
政府是相信LPG不及柴油環保的,否則客貨車早就轉LPG了!可惜又是好大喜功的文化累事,家下如果stop LPG計劃,邊個會要負責同下台?不是不能,是不為
當年好在某些小巴商會反對,先無好似的士咁一刀切一定要小巴轉石仔 jar!唔係,條等入氣車龍肯定更長
我而家驚的士同石小排出的廢氣多過金巴果d lor.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
的士~的氣1L先3.6甘就要吵大鑊！
油渣呢?~8.9喎！
我以前做台車.係怡安閣接的妹仔返機場！佢有三大包糯米雞！個的士佬一見到就話~160蚊全包入去呀！快的上車‧佢老細話CALL左車架啦！
跟住我就到啦！佢先死死氣先人！邊個搶客哪‧ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 leslie 於 2006-3-3 02:19 發表
外國大把Vito做的士啦!
唔使咁遠, 澳門就有. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 KZ2356 於 2006-3-2 10:30 發表
正如政府迷信鐵路之大載客量，而無理會一旦鐵路有故障的話的替代措施。
一條新鐵路通車前，政府的「招牌動作」莫過於減少與鐵路重疊之巴士線。
西鐵通車初期，倉卒通車，致事故頻生，只怪政府對鐵路之迷信， ...
(針對閣下"因鐵路故障要有替代措施而反對減少與鐵路重疊之巴士線"的論點)
你認為鐵路/巴士的角色係負責蝕本嗎?
首先要訂下鐵路/巴士日常營運不會蝕本的原則,
因為不可能以不健康狀況作為討論背景
當鐵路多人搭,巴士自然蝕->減班,
難道冇人搭都要巴士開密車嗎?
將軍澳係一個例子,
難道要巴士公司蝕住靜候地鐵故障?
中環乘客量鐵路巴士係一半一半,
那麼巴士公司是否又要加班一倍來準備吸納地鐵故障的乘客?
那即是說當鐵路/巴士各自有一定客量,
而其中一方故障/大塞車時,
在平時營運不蝕的原則下,
因雙方都沒有太多額外空間,
混亂係無法避免,
不管政府干預交通市場與否
另外照字面邏輯理解,
鐵路故障的替代措施,
只係應該在鐵路故障時疏導乘客,
而非在平時搶客
故此閣下論點不成立 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I believe Private cars and Taxi should be co exist in a society, as you can see many developed place, there are both private cars (in the form of luxury sedan/ van) to taxi. and If the government thinks that the Van is taking aways the taxi's income, creat taxis that can sit 6/7 passengers... then you both will have a fare competition....btw: as I think HK is a Lazzi Fare economy, government should just allow the competition between taxi and Van...remember, survivle of the fittest..
原帖由 arhang2001 於 2006-3-1 19:54 發表
我屋企就係做白牌既，有時唔係話搶唔搶佢地生意，
係有d生意佢地根本做唔到。
好簡單，我地主要客源，係真係有大件野跟身既人，
譬如成隻木門掉上車，裝修師傅又會有大把架生，
就算上到車，你估d的士大佬會 ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then I bet the Van drivers will also think it's unfair and come out to protest....a wise government's job is to make the society stable, not to great wave and wave of protest...
BTW: the van/ taxi problem are not new, remember the pre 80's private cars/taxi battles, by grandfater was both a taxi and private car owner...and these problem have been exists since after the WWII when there are both private cars and taxis exists.
原帖由 GK9398 於 2006-3-1 21:04 發表
建議政府把白牌van限制乘客於兩位內，反正白牌van以載貨為主！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota is alreay having a monopoly in the market...I think one thing that the government can do is give incentive to dealers that sell taxi (competitors) to balance the market.
原帖由 CALBEE 於 2006-3-2 11:07 發表
印象中該平治係無出到街，而當時公布此車是某商會，當時
我家公司亦考慮在親身體驗該車後，把其中五至十部車，更
換為該平治，始終可上輪椅及放貨物，而在市場上是沒有供
應類似的車型，而現今的士更只有一 ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are alot of vito taxi in Singapore
原帖由 leslie 於 2006-3-3 02:19 發表
沒錯,我都睇過架車,可惜結果唔成事,反而在新加坡見過架Vito做老人院救護車
外國大把Vito做的士啦! 香港ma...如果政府真是有心幫業界,好簡單,唔再限的士一定要用石仔,而可以選擇 Hybird (可惜Alphard Hybir ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 art0925 於 2006-3-4 07:16 發表
But I believe Private cars and Taxi should be co exist in a society, as you can see many developed place, there are both private cars (in the form of luxury sedan/ van) to taxi. and If the governm ...
The problem is that private cars(vans) earn money without a license.
It's not fair to taxi.
If anyone else who own a car can do their business,
the society will be in big trouble.
[ 本帖最後由 hk_ayu 於 2006-3-4 07:37 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But alot of places have private cars, and their license fee is much lower then taxi, take US for example, there are private luxury cars (mainly Lincolns, cadillacs) Van (Ford Econvan, Dodge Sprinter) and you can find them @ the airport, train stations, or hotels, ususally they charge similar to Taxi rate....and can carry more passenger sometimes...but I don't see taxi drivers complain...if taxi drivers feels competition, then i think they can try to use marketing strategy to lure passenger for taxi....and should be self-evulating, why they lose passenger, is it price/ service, etc. etc....remember in a market that have choice, consumer always is the one that can pick and choose...if government use regulation to limit choice of transportation to customers, then this is not all a free market economy..
what the government can do is to have police to ticket more of those "passenger only" van....or have a different license sceme for van...but for now on...I think in the PR battle, the taxi did lose it, because from alot of people that I've talked too....they are not sympathised with the taxi drivers...
原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2006-3-4 07:36 發表
The problem is that private cars(vans) earn money without a license.
It's not fair to taxi.
If anyone else who own a car can do their business,
the society will be in big trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
