72 全廣再現

感謝板主英明判決

連板主都認為投訴人應該在本文作出回覆

可惜當事人害怕面對有關事件禍害車長，竟然以訊息形式要求板主鎖文及删文

做得呢d 行為既人，大家心照

原帖由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-5 20:11 發表


出信比討論區負責人唔代表告討論區

我建議你搵個律師問清楚先好D

Not unless the discussion board would coporate and give in the information the layer or plaintiff or the law enforcement is looking for.

Its like a traffic violation caught by a camera that does not prosecuted on site
police department would send a letter requesting info from the vehicle owner
If the vehicle owner does not give in those information, they may be prosecuted

Or if you have know a good atterney, maybe I can be educated
The guy I know does mostly b-law~

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2013-2-5 23:13 發表


Not unless the discussion board would coporate and give in the information the layer or plaintiff or the law enforcement is looking for.

Its like a traffic violation caught by a camera that does no ...

Must admit that I do not practice much on defamation.

But so far as I understand/am practicing, you need only to pay attention to court orders. Letters from a solicitor... um, who cares?

[ 本帖最後由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-5 23:29 編輯 ]

原帖由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-5 23:24 發表


Must admit that I do not practice much on defamation.

But so far as I understand/am practicing, you need only to pay attention to court orders. Letters from a solicitor... um, who cares?

That's true!
But Not paying attention to the letter may explode to court order though.
Although it might take a while
I hope your professor didn't tell you to ignore legal relayed documents.

Iike what you said, it's all practicing. It's not certain, absolute.

原帖由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-5 23:24 發表


Must admit that I do not practice much on defamation.

But so far as I understand/am practicing, you need only to pay attention to court orders. Letters from a solicitor... um, who cares?

probably be a case of libel right?......if what the plaintiff spoken is not the truth

by the way, my friend asked me to view this topic.....he's a admin staff in the bus company

guess what dose it means

[ 本帖最後由 aiisack 於 2013-2-6 11:55 編輯 ]

唔係呢個版講太多 law.....有幾多人讀過

世界好多事都係情踩住法律邊緣, 有時候什至犯左法都未必知;

執法又未可以捉得哂, 又未必嚴格

渣架巴士比網友搞到比公司祭旗其實真係幾甘估你唔到
只能夠講, 盡量小心言行.....不知者, 不代表不罪

[ 本帖最後由 aiisack 於 2013-2-6 12:05 編輯 ]

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2013-2-6 11:07 發表

That's true!
But Not paying attention to the letter may explode to court order though.
Although it might take a while
I hope your professor didn't tell you to ignore legal relayed documents.
...

No professor tells me what to do.

I make a living on legal issues every day.

[ 本帖最後由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-6 17:53 編輯 ]

原帖由 aiisack 於 2013-2-6 12:02 發表
唔係呢個版講太多 law.....有幾多人讀過

世界好多事都係情踩住法律邊緣, 有時候什至犯左法都未必知;

執法又未可以捉得哂, 又未必嚴格

渣架巴士比網友搞到比公司祭旗其實真係幾甘估你唔到
只能夠講, 盡量小心言 ...

誰對誰錯我唔評論。

如果吹水吹大左, 自己刪文加句道歉就海闊天空；
如果人地係講事實, 你點向板主施壓都冇辦法。

呢個世界, 你可以搵律師既, 但值唔值囉...
我自己做呢行都係咁講, 有錢都唔係咁送俾律師賺,
上網大家求開心, 可以簡單解決大家握握手消啖氣就最好

原帖由 kwyeung 於 2013-2-6 17:41 發表

誰對誰錯我唔評論。

如果吹水吹大左, 自己刪文加句道歉就海闊天空；
如果人地係講事實, 你點向板主施壓都冇辦法。

呢個世界, 你可以搵律師既, 但值唔值囉...
我自己做呢行都係咁講, 有錢都唔係咁送俾律師賺,
上網大 ...

I have seen people sued someone for 24 dollars
Sometimes it's more than just money
I guess principle might the right word
For anyone who has a head would have known
Why would a bus driver pay, or bribe to be the word,someone to be in a picture?
Simply nonsense.


For this particular case, I heard that kmb had made a case (of coz internally)
And it involves with multiple drivers

拎部車出黎 , 又純粹受人指示 ,又唔係專登玩野

正所謂一山還比一山高 ,荔枝角廠有個長早大後備 又名 (梁x禮 ,x家禮 ,梁家x)
佢返襯960-S10 一定唔會出掛牌車 KU6118 ,多數都迫派更部出廣告車比佢
佢就巴閉lor , 去到一些熱門既拍攝位置 , 部巴士會自動清空電牌 (近期日子有 LP3786 同 LB8591)

按: 有行家影到 LP3786 960 S10 柯打31B ....返奥運站....清空牌箱

佢唔只返960 S10 可以咁做ar .. 佢返2A 拎 LL2812 .....明明樂華出站仲有牌,但去到樂雅苑自動熄牌