結果未又係死唔去，
之前換得艙，應該都可以再玩多兩三年先 byebye …… |
|
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
其實有可能長榮最後入A359/330NEO, 這可做短途和節雀培訓
CX可能入A330NEO代KA 333和CX772/773/333, 77W/777X重點長途大線, A359澳洲加二線歐洲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A330NEO 點 replace 都應該 replace 唔到而家 773，始終 773 真係載得多人。
反而之前好似有人傳話
35J/779 replace 77W
部份 77W replace 773
|
|
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
A330NEO,比起A350,B787優勢在於價格較低
CX買入了48架A350,發展新長途線都用唔晒
目前傳出CX將用6架A350取代長途A330
更多長途A330轉為短途之用，預計可以填補首批A330，772退役的空缺
買更多A350或買B787來取代長途A330,以解決長途A330運載力偏低，而且又冇cabin crew rest。取長途A330取替，不僅可以提升運載力、貨運量，而且提高燃油效益及盈利率。
至於長榮，已選擇了787，數量唔細，77W數量都多，再加傳過唔選A350，原因因為RR引擎，A350,330Neo得RR可選,加上長榮甚少買空巴，買A350可能性低
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KA用緊18隻A330，當夠未來要用20隻，又當20隻中當有一半因機齡要退，KA大約要收10-12隻CX A330。
但同時CX有成44隻A330，當中有大約9隻都係機齡較大，好大機會要退，都仲有超過30隻A330隨時過得比KA。
而相對上CX將重心發展長途線下，A330neo應該唔係CX甚至BR杯茶
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CX 發展長途線但係唔代表要放棄地區性航線，
始終東南亞係 CX 客艙 ……
|
|
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
找回2014年舊聞
http://www.aspireaviation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Cathay-FY2013-special-report.pdf
Cathay looks at A350-900 Regional or 787-10 for A330replacement
[Interestingly, despite a potential 10%-12% cut in the aircraft’s block fuel burnby re-engining the A330-300 which would be optimised for missions under2,000nm (nautical miles) (“Boeing 787 availability key in fending off A330neothreat“, 21st Feb, 14), thus covering Cathay and Dragonair’s entire NortheastAsia and Southeast Asia networks, it is understood to be sceptical of theA330neo idea and remain “uninterested” primarily due to the unquantifiablemarginal benefit it would bring over the existing A330-300s, which are alreadyfuel-efficient and fit into its network perfectly, Aspire Aviation‘s multiplesources at the oneworld member said.Aspire AviationCathay Pacific in for the long-haul12The aforementioned reduction in block fuel burn would be partially negated bythe EP2 enhancement package offered by engine-maker Rolls-Royce to itsTrent 772C-60 engine which delivers a 1% cut in specific fuel consumption(SFC). Additionally, a sharklet-like winglet device would deliver a “verymarginal” reduction in block fuel burn over the existing winglet, these sourcessaid.Above all, the fuel penalty burned in carrying fuel is “very small” on such shortsectors.
Therefore Cathay Pacific is considering the de-rated A350-900 Regional orthe 787-10 for its regional fleet replacement, both of which promiseconsiderably more sizeable fuel savings, the same sources say. While theA350-900 Regional offers flexibility to switch back to the 8,100nm baselinevariant, which will be required by Cathay to launch secondary Europeandestinations, the 787-10 Dreamliner offers more growth potential since it is aslightly larger airplane.The 323-seat 787-10 which burns 25% less fuel than a 295-seat A330-300 ona 3,000nm mission, assuming 85% annual wind, would be particularly wellsuitedto replace the carrier’s 777-200 and -300 fleets, which are denselyconfigured with 336 seats and 398 seats, respectively. Such a dense seatcount will offer an even larger per-seat fuel burn saving than the 25% figuretouted by Boeing, not to mention the excellent cargo-hauling capability whichAir Lease Corporation (ALC) chief executive Steven Udvar-Hazy said “weessentially have an airplane now that has almost the capacity of a 777-300ER, but with substantially lower trip costs and [direct operating costs] on aseat-mile basis”.Having said that, the A330-300 will continue to be the regional mainstay ofCathay’s and Dragonair’s fleets for years to come]
A330neo 比起A330 ceo 大約少10-12%油，唔算太吸引
787-10比起A330用25%少油當飛行3000海哩，而787-10比A359,772長，當經濟艙以3-3-3排列座位數一定比772,359高，772長63.7米，78X長68.3米，假設客艙同機身同時長左4.6米，經濟位座距為32吋，商務位座距為47點，商務位要多一排因為787機身比起772座，增多一排以維持同等數量商務位，會經濟艙比772多4排
座位數最多比772多36個
總載客量42 regional business class seats + (293+36=329)economy class seats =371 seats , the number of seats is close to 773 with 398 seats.
So, 78X is a possible replacement for 773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
本帖最後由 Aeon802 於 2015-11-21 14:54 編輯
再補多則最新相關文章
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cathay-details-expansion-with-incoming-a350s-777xs-419290/
Cathay details expansion with incoming A350s, 777Xs
Cathay Pacific says all of its incoming widebody jets will be directed at growth, and that the group will expand to a fleet of over 230 passenger aircraft (may be included dragonair )by 2025小弟重申整理文章內容：
CX計劃2025將營運230架客機
未來10年沒有計劃將現在777（應該係77w）退役
目標每年ASKs增長4－5％
A350-900主要用於歐洲，預計會用AMS,MXP新加的航班，並非外國網站流傳用了來取代77W,除此之外，FRA,DUS,ZRH有可能增班，據聞FRA,ZRH客量不錯,更多新航班及航點
A350-1000主要用於北美洲新增航班，不排除會取代77G飛行北美
359，35K,77W亦都會飛行澳洲，不排除更多餘的77W飛行澳洲
779用於高客量貨量歐美城市，LHR,JFK,LAX走唔甩，不排除ZRH,FRA會爆冷，由於貴客高企
359應用來取代772，舊333
再重申多次CX對A330neo無興趣
CX會繼續把握優勢，拓展北美市場
2013年，flightglobal放風市場對78X有興趣，不過當年訂了77X同幾架77W,以目前訂單來睇，CX有望會係下年加訂新機
[size=24.0001px]
[size=24.0001px]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
成篇文都係講緊 350 點樣 replace 現有 330、772、773 加點樣輔助現有 77W，
同時又話唔 consider 330neo ……
如果係咁，係唔係即係暗示緊佢地會入 787-10， |
|
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
787-10價錢較貴，停機坪傳聞指仍然同賣家討價還價中
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
樓主
