現階段都無誘因叫CX轉77W個config
ex-EK的773用3-4-3都係意料之内
個人覺得係777-9X投入服務後
CX會將部分77W改為regional去替773
到時就絕對會改3-4-3
其實3-4-3又唔算太難受
之前坐過AA的77W又覺得不算太差
不過就點都唔夠3-3-3好
|
|
|
|
|
溫哥華會有A350-900加持,但A350經濟位每一排9個只係剛剛好攞得落18"座位,根本比唔上777,更加比唔上A330
而且CX只要採用類近Air Canada 458-seat-high-density 77W galley and toilet設計,擺放36個thomspon vantage flat bed/ 42個現有商務艙,絕到無難道
 
上圖來自: cathaypacific.com ,下圖來自:seatplan.com
|
|
|
|
|
個問題係 AC 個經濟位根本就係窄,
不過人地 AC 真係 offer 到個機票低,但係 CX 又可以做到幾低價先?
我肯比多些少坐 CX 原因就係因為佢比 AC 舒服,
但假如到頭黎比仲要貴嘅價錢出黎去換同 AC 咁上下 o既服務質素,咁又有咩意思?
|
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
UPDATE NEWS:
KA 將會於本年第三季決定購入 737MAX 或 A320NEO,數量訂於 32 架。換句話講,即係有機隊擴張計劃:
https://www.ausbt.com.au/cathay- ... business-class-seat
Cathay is looking to purchase 32 new single-aisle jets from Airbus or Boeing “to replace the 23 in the Cathay Dragon fleet, so there’s growth in there as well.”
另外,Regional Business 都會於 2019 年底登場,但已經表明唔會係 flat-bed。 |
|
LJ7006 = MF5119 = AVD1
|
|
|
現在CX regional business class seats 用上narrow body 上,不僅浪費空間,而且頂腳。用上widebody,就被插。
實在有需要更換
|
|
|
|
|
牌面上A320neo with CFM贏(佢應該唔敢入PW, 望下UO果3隻A320neo隻隻都伏氣連連),除非Boeing買大送細
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|