edhong 發表於 2007-1-16 22:34

JX9097 發表於 2007-1-16 22:36

原帖由 ~誰@359~ 於 2007-1-16 22:30 發表

我地冇需要再討論樓主可以點樣返屋企
因為就算佢唔坐6/6A,地球依舊轉動,6/6A依舊疏車頂爆閘

冇錯...就算樓主唔係一定要咁樣返屋企
但個問題依然喺度,而且亦有唔少人「身受其害」

238X 發表於 2007-1-16 22:36

原帖由 edhong 於 2007-1-16 22:27 發表

this is main point, if i don't hurry up, why not spend much time to wait or travel bus?
but if you also want to complain 38a as the worst departures, do you think it is right ?

put this case on route 6/6a, i don't think the company and policy have any wrong,
as he has choices (time or money) and i can't see he is hurries up to do anything (only wants to save 50 cents).

You still don't get the main point son.

The main point is:

THE BUS COMPANY ALWAYS HAS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE PROPER SERVICE.
THE POSTER'S "FAILURE" TO TAKE ALTERNATIVES (IF EXISTS)
WILL NEVER MAKE THE BUS COMPANY RIGHT.

THE ACTION THAT YOU KEEP EMPHASIZING THE POSTER'S FAULT,
CAN BE REGARDED AS OFF-TOPIC DISCUSSION,
AND POSSIBLY CAUSE UNREASONABLE CRITICISM AGAINST THE POSTER.

gn3509 發表於 2007-1-16 22:39

原帖由 edhong 於 2007-1-16 22:34 發表


i only think does he have any other choice instead of 6/6a. and also other passengers.

if it is really bad service, why not complain it to TD ? beside of 50cents, i think passenger can tra ...

如果九巴個諗法好似你咁,
認為乘客要平既代價就係要迫餐飽,
咁佢需要諗下係咪應該將條線交番出黎....
(除非係運吉迫佢,但睇今次,連時間表個班次都做唔到,又似係佢自己問題,唔抵幫)

呢句係第三次講,
因為巴士公司同政府既問題,要乘客比多錢或者用多時間,係完全唔值得

唔好再將佢地既不合理行為合理化吧

[ 本帖最後由 gn3509 於 2007-1-16 22:45 編輯 ]

~誰@359~ 發表於 2007-1-16 22:42

原帖由 edhong 於 2007-1-16 22:34 發表


i only think does he have any other choice instead of 6/6a. and also other passengers.

if it is really bad service, why not complain it to TD ? beside of 50cents, i think passenger can tra ...
今次同上次682事件其實有咩分別呢?
其實冇乜嫁,兩件事都係講有巴士線疏車、唔夠載
唯一差別就係今次樓主係為慳五毫子
咁樣就令到你既立場有咁大差別…我真係冇野好講

唔夠車就係唔夠車嫁啦…少左個慳錢客
唔通情況就會大幅度改善咩…:L

gn3509 發表於 2007-1-16 22:47

原帖由 ~誰@359~ 於 2007-1-16 22:42 發表

今次同上次682事件其實有咩分別呢?
其實冇乜嫁,兩件事都係講有巴士線疏車、唔夠載
唯一差別就係今次樓主係為慳五毫子
咁樣就令到你既立場有咁大差別…我真係冇野好講

唔夠車就係唔夠車嫁啦…少左個慳 ...
我認為佢既諗法

682:因為貴過其他選擇(89C/D→地鐵),所以應該要有合理服務質素才對
6/6A:平過其他選擇,服務差係應該,頂唔順就自己過主

無言:L

~誰@359~ 發表於 2007-1-16 22:49

原帖由 gn3509 於 2007-1-16 22:47 發表

我認為佢既諗法

682:因為貴過其他選擇(89C/D→地鐵),所以應該要有合理服務質素才對
6/6A:平過其他選擇,服務差係應該,頂唔順就自己過主

無言:L
咁係咪代表A10要開到三分鐘一班,71B幾日先開一架車?;P

dennislokawai 發表於 2007-1-16 22:55

原帖由 edhong 於 2007-1-16 10:06 PM 發表


he can choose 2, 7, 9 in same bus terminus, why only 6 and 6A ? he can save many time if he travels these routes.
我唔介意你話我為慳5毫子而等咁耐車,
但即使我改搭其他路線或唔搭車過佐敦,
6/6A車疏清唔到客同唔跟時間表既問題依舊存在。
我就話可以唔搭,但其他人呢?
唔通因為九巴做得差我地唔應該出聲,
而要自行選擇其他貴車去我要去既地方?

kmb~mcw1 發表於 2007-1-16 22:57

dennislokawai 發表於 2007-1-16 23:07

原帖由 kmb~mcw1 於 2007-1-16 10:57 PM 發表
我對6/6A也有一些看法
我在暑假期間。我便搭過多次6A/6

1.在某個星期日,6號在假日不出熱狗
但是假日出熱狗,而且我坐中佢由旺角去深水po

2.在佐敦等6/6A都要成5/7分鐘。我打算搭6/6A
結果有2號的拖卡 ...
首先唔該你貼文之前請睇睇自己寫嘜,
我真係睇你篇文睇到一頭霧水...:L

暑假同依家既服務已經係兩回事了,
我由05年開始就等6/6A出佐敦轉車,
一直以來6/6A俾我既服務都唔錯,
雖然比起幾年前疏左好多,
但總算班次都合理同幾平均。
不過近呢幾個月開始越做越差,
經常等成15-20分鐘先有車,
仲要晌尖咀總站就上到要企,
以前根本唔會上到咁勁,
你得閒試下6點幾7點晌尖咀等下就會明架。

我都知仲有2號係相同價錢,
但無奈佢同95無轉乘優惠呢!:Q
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15
查看完整版本: 對6/6A越來越不滿!