聽聞當年李生鐘意富豪車多D
結果買下買下就成堆富豪係度跑公路、上鴨橋、上置富斜、甚至上石排灣斜啦
如果當年批豬扒唔係研發得遲，我諗而家東涌會變左成堆豬扒 instead of Trident :L ...
其實有個怪少少既唸法.....
如果Cityflyer 沿用依家設計,Wright 殻一定掃低E500.... 原帖由 S3N92 於 2010-5-21 05:33 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
我相信一定比左好大的折扣
原部運點會平得過大陸砌...點都無可能
Maybe, but then the shipping cost to bring the chassis and kits up to China, and then ship the buses back also incur a cost, which may not be as cheap as you think.
I wouldn't even think these B9TL would be cheaper than the E500 at listed price, but the difference should not be massive. And in any case, with such a large order, Volvo could of course offer a competitive price as well - a very common practice is any manufacturing industry. 原帖由 S3N92 於 2010-5-21 15:41 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔好騎劫我說話
呢d初頭set up cost....如果仲響新一批度反映出黎......我都覺得唔會有人信
Of course part of the set up cost will be covered under ongoing sales. That is part of the RoI, or Return of Investment.
To give you a bit of commercial knowledge, each product's price would take into account of it's direct production cost, and also indirect costs like overhead and non-recurring set up cost, under a projected breakeven point i.e. the quantity which they have to sell to recover the total investment cost and make an actual profit in the product's life.
Even if they passed that breakeven point, they will only knock the price down to a point where profit margin is deemed acceptable to the business. Unless you know certainly the ADL have passed that point, I don't think your claim can be substantiated. Put it this way, what kind of costs do you think ADL would have to incur to set up that production line in China anyway, you have any idea? 原帖由 NV58 於 2010-5-22 02:10 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Of course part of the set up cost will be covered under ongoing sales. That is part of the RoI, or Return of Investment.
To give you a bit of commercial knowledge, each product's price would take...
我都叫讀過下商科
多謝你的小溫習...但我都識搵書睇啦
言下之意..我得個講字
咁唔知閣下又有乜大証據同資料搵到你所講的...E500唔會平得過B9呢 原帖由 KR4210 於 2010-5-22 01:34 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
AVBWU 兩部都坐過,
起步同上斜都好好力,
屯門公路好輕易咁爬左部都普電躉:D
OT...
本人只曾於italk發此主題,
唔知點解本人篇文會完全一樣咁俾人copy到另一討論區,
只係內容d文字被搬前搬後.
呢d事亦唔係第一次發生:@
ISL 得返 8.9L
自然無 D9_ 同 DC9 咁好力…
個人覺得城巴引入 B9 代替 CityFlyer 先算明智
畢竟跑公路係咪中驅都無咩大分別
而舒適度先重要
OT.
你亦不是唯一一位受害者…
之不過早排出事文章係來自商用車個邊… 原帖由 3ASV467 於 2010-5-22 11:47 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
ISL 得返 8.9L
自然無 D9_ 同 DC9 咁好力…
個人覺得城巴引入 B9 代替 CityFlyer 先算明智
畢竟跑公路係咪中驅都無咩大分別
而舒適度先重要
OT.
你亦不是唯一一位受害者…
之不過早排出事文章係來自商用車個邊… ...
乜而家d e500唔夠舒適？ 原帖由 S3N92 於 2010-5-22 11:49 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
乜而家d e500唔夠舒適？
我覺得同B10TL, B9TL 比都差左少少.. 原帖由 S3N92 於 2010-5-22 11:49 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
乜而家d e500唔夠舒適？
中驅車…
單係過彎個下已經扣晒分…
都仲未計 Trident 副一流懸掛:handshake 原帖由 3ASV467 於 2010-5-22 12:22 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
中驅車…
單係過彎個下已經扣晒分…
都仲未計 Trident 副一流懸掛:handshake
總好過D B10TL 過彎側到前軸離地先
回復 56# 的帖子
教一次可以砌1000部以上E500人ge成本多極有限
而且用家應該會驗收ge......上落費用點都唔係ADL咩la