原帖由 KY5393 於 2010-6-15 12:51 發表 http://wwww.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔知E400上層d座椅既椅距比其他車型大同埋下層太平門用玻璃算唔算呢....
下層太平門用玻璃是為了減輕重量?
不可能吧?它們的分別有10kg嗎?
原帖由 YanShing 於 2010-6-15 14:38 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
下層太平門用玻璃是為了減輕重量?
不可能吧?它們的分別有10kg嗎?
呢個係九巴當年對外宣傳既"重點", 改用玻璃係因為減重同省油
原帖由 小早川優 於 2010-6-15 01:43 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
點解唔試下入返11m車? 根據呢部B9TL嘅座椅編排，11m版本相信可以做到U51/L29，就算堅持用直梯，座椅數目應該同呢部B9TL差唔多（連企位約可載110人左右）。 ...
The problem is the weight issue will come into play. Lothian has a large fleet of 11.4m B9TLs which has a H48/32F layout, but only gets 10 standing capacity because of the weight. This gives a capacity of 90 passengers, which is not much more than a 10.4m one can carry, and dare I say, not worth it.
原帖由 FS7418 於 2010-6-14 13:55 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
城記有幾耐無同volvo買車
好似足十年了...
原帖由 HU6455 於 2010-6-15 15:10 發表 http://wwww.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
呢個係九巴當年對外宣傳既"重點", 改用玻璃係因為減重同省油
厲害!!甚麼也是他說了算......
倒不如叫每個司機減肥十磅,也可以減重和省油:victory:
原帖由 NV58 於 2010-6-14 23:22 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
The problem is the weight issue will come into play. Lothian has a large fleet of 11.4m B9TLs which has a H48/32F layout, but only gets 10 standing capacity because of the weight. This gives a capac ...
I wasn't really refering to 2-axle version when talking about the 11m version of B9TL. It should be 3-axle just like the ADL counterpart, but the arrangement of components such as fuel tank can be adjusted according to the 2-axle version to free up more space especially there is more than enough space under the straight staircase of KMB's specification for placement of a fuel tank or adblue tank.
原帖由 小早川優 於 2010-6-15 03:34 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
I wasn't really refering to 2-axle version when talking about the 11m version of B9TL. It should be 3-axle just like the ADL counterpart, but the arrangement of components such as fuel tank can be a ...
It's not feasible for B9/E500 to have a <12m (3-axle) straight staircase + wheelchair config. & not related to where the placement of the fuel tank
原帖由 111 於 2010-6-14 23:48 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
It's not feasible for B9/E500 to have a
未出現過唔代表唔可行。表面上跟據九巴個設計，12m似乎係三軸直梯車嘅下限，但係大家有無發覺自從E500時代開始個輪椅位係比以前多左半個窗位（呢部城巴B9TL將一排梗凳擺喺輪椅位度正好反映出呢點）？如果將輪椅位縮返去躉同扒嘅水平係可以令架車短多半個窗口位，就算無11.3m都有11.5~11.6m。
原帖由 小早川優 於 2010-6-15 03:58 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
未出現過唔代表唔可行。表面上跟據九巴個設計，12m似乎係三軸直梯車嘅下限，但係大家有無發覺自從E500時代開始個輪椅位係比以前多左半個窗位（呢部城巴B9TL將一排梗凳擺喺輪椅位度正好反映出呢點）？如果將輪椅位縮返去躉同 ...
我明白你說法，我都有懷疑過如40xx頭軸後個位夠唔夠放輪椅(其實位置和50xx/12xx差不多長)
但實際40xx沒用這設計
原帖由 111 於 2010-6-15 16:30 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
我明白你說法，我都有懷疑過如40xx頭軸後個位夠唔夠放輪椅(其實位置和50xx/12xx差不多長)
但實際40xx沒用這設計
要輪椅泊s位:L
果度又窄左少少
泊埋有d困難, 尤其電動果d:L