廣東道站問題

而家會延長去文化中心已經有短左一大半
另一邊起SUBWAY 去佐敦/廣東道 AS WELL

原帖由 SSBT 於 2009-6-21 11:37 發表
一句九龍人懶行就要起新站,
到底起廣東道站乎唔乎合成本效益先?
起新站後新增既乘客可唔可以 cover 到個成本先?
如果要起新站唔多唔少都要掘爛條廣東道,
班居民同商戶接唔接受到尖沙咀又大興土木先?

First of all I didn't expect it to be built in the very near future.

The tunnel is already there and the main structure of the station can only be built under Ocean Centre and Harbour City due to the limited width of Canton Road. The construction of the station can only start along with the redevelopment of Ocean Centre and Harbour City. Traffic on Canton Road won't be disrupted and the station won't cost much to build.

As the station concourse is actually under Ocean Centre and Harbour City, most passengers will have to pass through the mall to access the station and this provides a great incentive for Whart T&T to fund part of the project.

There could be four entrances with two of them inside Harbour City, one inside Ocean Centre and one at the TST Star Ferry plaza round-about.



[ 本帖最後由 Kaix 於 2009-6-21 15:44 編輯 ]

原帖由 Kaix 於 2009-6-20 22:15 發表


u have given a good reason supporting the existence of Canton Road Station.
廣東道站則位於尖沙咀最繁華地段.


Canton Road strip up to Jordan Road will soon be as bustling as the parallel Nathan Road ...

如果你係講緊東西線七年後落成
或者西九吾知幾時落成，
咁我絕對吾會反對廣東道站
其實我諗呢度都冇人會反對多建一個站
我自己係西鐵常客，多個站不知幾好
但我只會話今日都未必有確實需要

原帖由 N672D 於 2009-6-21 12:38 發表
而家會延長去文化中心已經有短左一大半
另一邊起SUBWAY 去佐敦/廣東道 AS WELL

I don't get what's meant by 短左一大半.
Don't u realise that people still have to walk a long long way in the subway.

The furthest aceptable walking distance from East TST Station towards west is up to Nathan Road and that from Austin Station towards south is up to China Hong Kong City.

Building Canton Road Station along with the redevelopment of Harbour City is cheap and easy.

[ 本帖最後由 Kaix 於 2009-6-21 15:45 編輯 ]

原帖由 ahbong 於 2009-6-21 14:39 發表


如果你係講緊東西線七年後落成
或者西九吾知幾時落成，
咁我絕對吾會反對廣東道站
其實我諗呢度都冇人會反對多建一個站
我自己係西鐵常客，多個站不知幾好
但我只會話今日都未必有確實需要 ...

If u talk abt the actual need currently, I would say Austin Station is the least needed while Canton Road Staion is more needed. But Canton Road station can only be built along with the redevelopment of Harbour City.

Having said that Austin Station is least needed, it will become another busy station after the completion of all those huge projects.

原帖由 Kaix 於 2009-6-21 15:08 發表


Don't u realise that people still have to walk a long long way in the subway.

The furthest aceptable walking distance from East TST Station towards west is up to Nathan Road and that from Austin Station towards south is up to China Hong Kong City

其實由尖東站步行往尖沙咀站所要步行的實際距離係非常少
我試過全程站於四條自動行人道上不步行
所需要的時間仍少於 7 分鐘

所以我絕對可以接受由尖東站經自動行人道步行往廣東道
當然，不同人士對可接受的步程有不同見解
而若果不能接受此步程
東西線的乘客大可以於九龍塘站轉乘官塘線及荃灣線到尖沙咀站
甚至，待沙中線過海段落成後，於金鐘站轉乘荃灣線到尖沙咀站

廣東道絕對有建站必要, 而家西鐵去尖東, 根本到喉唔到肺. 當初九鐵慌死益左九倉, 要九倉出錢起站, 都唔知想點.

原帖由 PB602 於 2009-6-21 22:08 發表
廣東道絕對有建站必要, 而家西鐵去尖東, 根本到喉唔到肺. 當初九鐵慌死益左九倉, 要九倉出錢起站, 都唔知想點.

廣東道站又唔係彌敦道
起埋都係一個尖東一個尖西
其實俾你起埋
又有幾「到喉到肺」丫

我唔係反對起站
只不過贊成既理由都太牽強吧
尖東站行一個街口已經係彌敦道吧

[ 本帖最後由 ahbong 於 2009-6-21 22:18 編輯 ]

原帖由 ahbong 於 2009-6-21 22:12 發表
廣東道站又唔係彌敦道
起埋都係一個尖東一個尖西
其實俾你起埋
又有幾「到喉到肺」丫

我唔係反對起站
只不過贊成既理由都太牽強吧
尖東站行一個街口已經係彌敦道吧 ...

Nathan Road is not the final destination for most people.
It is only a place for them to get on and off a bus or a train.

The main commercial and shopping area of TST is actually Canton Road, not Nathan Road.

[ 本帖最後由 Kaix 於 2009-6-21 23:23 編輯 ]

原帖由 SSBT 於 2009-6-21 11:37 發表
一句九龍人懶行就要起新站,
到底起廣東道站乎唔乎合成本效益先?
起新站後新增既乘客可唔可以 cover 到個成本先?
如果要起新站唔多唔少都要掘爛條廣東道,
班居民同商戶接唔接受到尖沙咀又大興土木先?

我都認同起新站係會方便好多,
但係港鐵係上市公司,
唔會同你講"方便",
只會講新站可以賺多幾多錢

如果一個新車站真係要合乎成本效益, 賺錢先興建,
咁我諗現階段, 柯士甸站直情唔駛起啦,
如果有廣東道站,
我唔信柯士甸站會多人過廣東道站