[經歷分享/報告]
港鐵西營盤站啟用後巴士路線乘客客量變化
[複製鏈接]
|
原帖由 castanopsis 於 2015-4-16 01:02 發表 
23真係好視乎邊個位計、何為之繁忙時間
上繁上山返學時段基本上淨堅麗閣都落30人
計埋減班,不跌反升唔奇
要記住,所謂「通車前」只係西營盤站既「通車前」
港大站通咗車之後,23下午-下繁已經唔識企
西營盤站通埋車如果 ... 其實樓主無答到通車前係指邊D數據
但有D線係1228後客量係急插,5X本身1228前8成1228後得返5成,無理由1228到西營盤站開通前,又去返8成咁多,雖然本身都減左班
但減班時間係1月,西營盤站通之前,運吉只係交左南區堆線3月頭數據比南區區議會,西區堆線既數就hold起左無擺上區議會
不過5X係西營盤站開左之後條數彈唔返,減班又做左,某程度反映西區流水線無得救,5X畢竟都只係一條跑少少公路既流水線
執左5,下次應該唔係搞5B就搞5X,5B都講明按客量調整班次,始終獨巿位唔多,1同10獨巿就算客量跌都唔搞得
至於18,如果想按原有cut車數量計劃去重組路線,真係唔知有咩方法,只怪當日D垃圾建議條數計得太盡,運吉又唔知會唔會開綠燈cut少D車
[ 本帖最後由 kay 於 2015-4-16 07:00 編輯 ] |
|
合理行為不容無理干涉,後果自負
|
|
|
整咗嗰表,容易啲睇
| 通車前 | 一月 | 三月
(南區) | 四月 | 四月與通車前比較 | 四月與
一月比較 | 1 | 88% | 51% |
| 55% | -33% | +4% | 5 | 66% | 51% |
| 48% | -18% | -3% | 5B | 93% | 38% |
| 63% | -30% | +25% | 5C | 77% | 30% |
| 32% | -45% | +2% | 5P | 91% | 42% |
| 46% | -45% | +4% | 5S | 56% | 47% |
| 39% | -17% | -8% | 10 | 79% | 67% |
| 66% | -13% | -1% | 5X | 85% | 55% |
| 56% | -29% | +1% | 18 | 73% | 32% |
| 84% | +11% | +52% | 18P | 98% | 44% |
| 83% | -15% | +39% | 18X | 77% | 36% |
| 67% | -10% | +31% | 3B | 65% | 23% |
| 33% | -32% | +10% | 12 | 59% | 53% |
| 25% | -34% | -28% | 12M | 59% | 64% |
| 40% | -19% | -24% | 13 | 58% | 55% |
| 31% | -27% | -24% | 23 | 73% | 58% |
| 83% | +10% | +25% | 23B | 56% | 17% |
| 33% | -23% | +16% | 103 | 75% | 50% |
| 100% | +25% | +50% | 103P | 43% | 30% |
| 44% | +1% | +14% | 101 | 89% | 84% |
| 99% | +10% | +15% | 104 | 91% | 75% |
| 100% | +9% | +25% | 113 | 74% | 73% |
| 90% | +16% | +17% | 973 | 100% | 64% | 77% | 94% | -6% | +30% | 973P | 77% | 54% | 47% | 78% | +1% | +24% | 904 | 91% | 78% |
| 70% | -21% | -8% | 905 | 77% | 50% |
| 99% | +22% | +49% | 970 | 90% | 76% | 83% | 98% | +8% | +22% | 970X | 95% | 63% | 79% | 92% | -3% | +29% | 971 | 99% | 53% | 78% | 100% | +1% | +47% |
字數關係,南區線於下個回覆 |
|
|
|
|
續上
| 通車前 | 一月 | 三月
(南區) | 四月 | 四月與通車前比較 | 四月與
一月比較 | 23B | 56% | 17% |
| 33% | -23% | +16% | 7 | 80% | 62% | 81% | 89% | +9% | +27% | 37A | 86% | 67% | 81% | 61% | -25% | -6% | 37B | 86% | 69% | 70% | 70% | -16% | +1% | 37X | 86% | 67% | 68% | 61% | -25% | -6% | 40 | 90% | 50% | 77% | 65% | -25% | +15% | 40M | 63% | 43% | 48% | 49% | -14% | +6% | 40P | 62% | 41% | 40% | 41% | -21% | +0% | 71 | 100% | 88% | 77% | 76% | -24% | -12% | 71P | 100% | 94% | 60% | 72% | -28% | -22% | 4 | 63% | 49% | 76% | 92% | +29% | +43% | 4X | 83% | 62% | 88% | 70% | -13% | +8% | 30X | 70% | 56% | 59% | 41% | -29% | -15% | 43X | 64% | 45% | 48% | 45% | -19% | +0% | 46X | 85% | 56% | 25% | 33% | -52% | -23% | 90B | 91% | 78% | 78% | 87% | -4% | +9% | 91 | 92% | 60% | 89% | 81% | -11% | +21% | 94 | 89% | 77% | 64% | 50% | -39% | -27% | 94X | 82% | 57% | 89% | 70% | -12% | +13% |
假設所有數據以同一地點方式記錄(亦理應如此),四月與一月比較部份路線已止跌回升,原因可能是乘客回流與減班所致。
流水線各線跌幅較大但回復較正常水平,12M 13 則成為西營盤站的新輸家。再留意南區四月與三月的比較,會發現有啲線喺一個月內已經有較大變動,所以呢啲數字呢,信不信?反正我信了!
P.S.1>你估呢條數會唔會上交運會啦?上嘅話運吉都幾難搞
P.S.2>點解無咗 47P 嘅?被無視到咁?仲駛唔駛取消呢咁? |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
|
|
|
通車前 一月 四月 四月與通車前比較 四月與一月比較
18 73% 32% 84% +11% +52%
運吉同新記可吾可以講下CUT18既理據??? |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 mingfai31 於 2015-4-16 00:02 發表 
1個月前有係下繁金鐘睇過23..開7-10分班都唔識企人
另外18同18P基本上都係個堆客源
好多人都係見邊架黎就上邊架架啦
拉埋一齊睇其實都只係相若
仲有係減左班先係呢條數
但我始終好質疑條數點黎
係咪轉左新計法吹大左條數
個SOURCE係邊黎..幾號幾時數乜資料都冇
好難信囉我會覺得
尤其係不跌反升個堆
差唔多全部過海都可以升呢樣真係好神
好專業架,見過幾次客量調查,西隧港島方向有,不過訓覺既,水街又有,兩個帥奶,打牙較多過睇車填表... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 tomchen 於 2015-4-16 17:19 發表 
好專業架,見過幾次客量調查,西隧港島方向有,不過訓覺既,水街又有,兩個帥奶,打牙較多過睇車填表... 根本用肉眼觀察呢個方法就唔會準
除左以前班班都頂閘既
970系
咁就一定唔會有錯 |
|
|
|
|
數字準確與否,值得深思。
不少路線的數字都十分奇怪。 |
|
|
|
|
某些巴士線減班後
客量又升番
證明巴士線還一定吸引大
運輸署冇藉口再CUT班
TD標準客量超過9成可加班
某些會否加番班,心照 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|