S3BL343@66
發表於 2008-9-8 17:35
原帖由 wilsonli321 於 2008-9-7 20:10 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
因為好多反對重組既人都好似你所持既怪邏輯:「路線number數目愈多,服務就愈好」:L
以此邏輯反對551-553,即使話到7彩,我也不認為這是551-553唔work
好多人一講輕鐵問題,只會拿出一幅輕鐵路線圖去「紙」上談兵,514/ ...
係因為超多人因重組後要轉車,先反對,明嗎:L
wilsonli321
發表於 2008-9-8 19:03
樂仔〞
發表於 2008-9-8 19:14
原帖由 wilsonli321 於 2008-9-8 19:03 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
事實分析,唔見得好多人要轉車,
反而經過4年的折磨,愈來愈多人覺悟明白了拆P方案根本係搵笨,
拆P方案,聽落去仲有好多直線,以為唔洗轉車,
可惜實際車務運作混亂,乘客親身感受被搵笨了:L :L ...
最重要既唔係 P 線
係 505 507 呢 2 條高客量線
wilsonli321
發表於 2008-9-8 19:17
樂仔〞
發表於 2008-9-8 19:24
原帖由 wilsonli321 於 2008-9-8 19:17 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
所以要重組,變成更密的551 553:loveliness:
都係個句
要好多人轉車
同埋反而原本預開時間開預唔到 , 仲煩
wilsonli321
發表於 2008-9-8 19:28
S3BL343@66
發表於 2008-9-9 19:09
原帖由 wilsonli321 於 2008-9-8 19:28 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
對比受班之混亂影響的輕鐵全體屯門區乘客,
多了要轉車的人數,不見得是好多人
而家班次混亂,仲難預時間
你又點知唔是好多人?
PoohPoohJoe
發表於 2008-9-9 19:51
Actually,
I think both sides did not prove that how many people will be affected
I think both sides should give out some proof to prove that.
Otherwise if we just say "too many"
We can not get a result after 48 pages of discussion,,
樂仔〞
發表於 2008-9-9 20:05
原帖由 PoohPoohJoe 於 2008-9-9 19:51 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Actually,
I think both sides did not prove that how many people will be affected
I think both sides should give out some proof to prove that.
Otherwise if we just say "too many"
We can not get a resul ...
你自己唔睇文姐
我講左架
係 wilson 死都唔受
wilsonli321
發表於 2008-9-9 21:26