原帖由 rickywk 於 2006-3-28 10:52 發表
翻新，搵Bombardier，佢應該肯;P
我估翻新都係機電部份，漏水問題，噴下油就算;P
聽講當年Bombardier好似係提供機電咋wor，車身係CAF的出品。
不過地鐵見過鬼都好應該怕黑啦掛……:lol
當年ADTranz唔知有冇呻笨，搵著CAF呢間野做JV，真係盞攪...
話時話，AEL開始翻噴工程，幾時到TCL做?
原帖由 rickywk 於 2006-3-29 00:04 發表
當年ADTranz唔知有冇呻笨，搵著CAF呢間野做JV，真係盞攪...
話時話，AEL開始翻噴工程，幾時到TCL做?
宜家地鐵d K車咪又係用返AD Tranz的台車。:lol
AEL搞掂晒的話，都輪到TCL架啦(到時東涌K都可能出o左黎搵食)，怕且……
原帖由 500 於 2006-3-29 00:17 發表
宜家地鐵d K車咪又係用返AD Tranz的台車。:lol
AEL搞掂晒的話，都輪到TCL架啦(到時東涌K都可能出o左黎搵食)，怕且……
無計，如果大嶼山批車唔係價賤者得，ADTranz一手攪掂，應該唔會咁差
原帖由 rickywk 於 2006-3-29 00:21 發表
無計，如果大嶼山批車唔係價賤者得，ADTranz一手攪掂，應該唔會咁差
台鐵當年咪就係因為果四個字同冇點做過事前技術資格審查，最後咪買o左抽十分爛的PP自強號……:L
原帖由 500 於 2006-3-29 00:28 發表
台鐵當年咪就係因為果四個字同冇點做過事前技術資格審查，最後咪買o左抽十分爛的PP自強號……:L 電機野一分錢有一分貨已經偷笑
原帖由 rickywk 於 2006-3-29 00:58 發表
電機野一分錢有一分貨已經偷笑
咁又未必啊，如果你有適當的眼光的話……
大型家電、電子產品、甚至升降機都有可能一分錢八九分貨。
*話名眼光，當然要睇個人本身有幾多功力同事前功課做得足唔夠啦。:lol
原帖由 kychung 於 2006-3-28 04:36 發表
(不過可能買Goninan車黎就將軍澳線都唔定架:lol)
That would definitely be great for the Australian Economy, however, Goninan's technology is no where near Kinki-Sharyo. The SP1900s are probably one of the best-built metro trains in the world.
Like a few boardmates have pointed out, it would probably be most cost-efficient and ideal to acquire brand new rollingstock to replace the MLRs for KCRC, when you think about it, they have been around for 2 decades.
As for MTRC, they seem to be pretty happy with the ROTEMs due to the $$ factor, but you never know, they might decide to launch a tender and have different companies bid for their rollingstock replacement. What is the designed life-cycle for the M-trains, like 30 years? 40 years? They probably weren't originally designed with handling the workload that they have to handle these days...
原帖由 kmb3asv3 於 2006-3-29 06:00 發表
That would definitely be great for the Australian Economy, however, Goninan's technology is no where near Kinki-Sharyo. The SP1900s are probably one of the best-built metro trains in the world. ...
I agree.
The refurbishment work of MLR has completed just a few years,
but judging from their performance and interior, I don't think they look like refurbished at all.;P
In some ways they perform worse than before refurbishment! :@
(e.g. cabin vibrations, carriage-joint "earthquakes")
That's not the train's fault, the problem is the "unrealistic ambition"
to increase the load indefinitely onto these middle-aged trains.
They were designed to be "suburban trains", not "metro trains", but they are playing the role as metro trains.
For the M-trains of MTR, it's a bit better, probably because they were designed to be metro trains,
and they can withstand the frequent startings and stoppings, doors banging and every square inch crowded with people.
I support KCRC continuing to buy new trains from reliable companies in the future,
even if it's a bit expensive and requires me to give some of the money. :victory:
K-train is not the best, but I believe Rotem will improve with more experiences,
so I have no opinion on the future of MTR trains.