ME @ 70X / 71K

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-23 19:03 發表


我唔係質疑ME既歷史
我質疑既係板友所講晚年ME既表現
晚年既ME仲可以稱為車皇?無可能認同

ME有優點有缺點
你愛屋及烏唔代表我都要

朋友,話唔係咁講
球皇比利如果而家出來踢波,一定唔夠c 朗勁
但你可唔可以否認而家既佢係球皇?
球皇e個名可以陪住個歷史一路留存落去

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-23 07:03 PM 發表


我唔係質疑ME既歷史
我質疑既係板友所講晚年ME既表現
晚年既ME仲可以稱為車皇?無可能認同

ME有優點有缺點
你愛屋及烏唔代表我都要

咁咪就係唔可以以偏蓋全囉..

我無話你要好似我或者其他人咁愛屋及烏
不過你唔認為唔等於要質疑囉
但似乎係你要呢度咁多人認同你既觀點多D

[ 本帖最後由 CZ_6686 於 2010-2-24 02:02 編輯 ]

原帖由 [MinG] 於 2010-2-24 01:57 AM 發表

朋友,話唔係咁講
球皇比利如果而家出來踢波,一定唔夠c 朗勁
但你可唔可以否認而家既佢係球皇?
球皇e個名可以陪住個歷史一路留存落去

好既比喻,等於許冠傑而家都係叫歌神,
米高佐敦都係叫籃球之神一樣

原帖由 CZ_6686 於 2010-2-24 02:04 發表

好既比喻,等於許冠傑而家都係叫歌神,
米高佐敦都係叫籃球之神一樣

可能我同你既examples 出現既人物響佢度有生之年都未出現過失手,令人難免有點難明白
李寧e一個例子就可以算係較為貼切一點

原帖由 [MinG] 於 2010-2-24 02:12 AM 發表

可能我同你既examples 出現既人物響佢度有生之年都未出現過失手,令人難免有點難明白
李寧e一個例子就可以算係較為貼切一點

佐敦都唔係場場嬴啦
不過算啦,我都話佢係要講都大把理由

起晚年, 都有不少司機鍾意ME, 吾想渣(康偈)S3BL, S3N,
曾經有個76K司機講笑咁講叫我地D巴士迷寫信叫九巴快D退曬D S3BL,
話佢地個BRAKE震到不得了, 避震又"櫈",

當然,如果純以長途公路線來說, 晚年ME一定冇一眾康偈車受司機喜愛,,,
但除左長途公路線外, 其他路線 ME 一定比其他車款(冷馬除外)受司機喜愛,

起碼起步, 剎車, 轉灣, 避震, 都仍然非常出色,
就算去到金車年代, 都吾係款款都能夠集各項長處於一身..

有次臨71K轉全冷時,問過部分車長, 佢地都話咁多款熱狗中, ME 係最好渣,
佢地話, MCW吾夠軚, S3BL 震, ...

原帖由 [MinG] 於 2010-2-24 01:57 發表

朋友,話唔係咁講
球皇比利如果而家出來踢波,一定唔夠c 朗勁
但你可唔可以否認而家既佢係球皇?
球皇e個名可以陪住個歷史一路留存落去

你都識過喇
球王既名係以前冠冕既
你點可以以佢而家既表現黎肯定佢過去既輝煌?
而家(其實係一直以黎)有人係講ME行上水線戰績如何彪炳
所以係車皇如何如何

正如到今時今日都有人叫3AD牛肺龍
一D都唔公道咯

一剎那既光輝代唔代表永恆
見人見智咯

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-24 17:33 發表


你都識過喇
球王既名係以前冠冕既
你點可以以佢而家既表現黎肯定佢過去既輝煌?
而家(其實係一直以黎)有人係講ME行上水線戰績如何彪炳
所以係車皇如何如何

正如到今時今日都有人叫3AD牛肺龍
一D都唔公道咯

一剎那 ...

我諗你都唔知自己諗緊乜定
佢以前係球王你而家會唔會咁叫佢?
therefore, O305 is the same.
你既意思姐係佢唔再係球王?
咁邊個叫球王比利?

原帖由 [MinG] 於 2010-2-25 06:16 發表

我諗你都唔知自己諗緊乜定
佢以前係球王你而家會唔會咁叫佢?
therefore, O305 is the same.
你既意思姐係佢唔再係球王?
咁邊個叫球王比利?

I don't think you understand what I mean
say this is the timeline
A----------B------------Current

Given that outstanding performance at A -> title was give at A
its logically wrong to proove: title given at A by performance occured at time B

ME has that title, no problem~ but the reasoning to support it is what matters

原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2010-2-25 07:23 發表


I don't think you understand what I mean
say this is the timeline
A----------B------------Current

Given that outstanding performance at A -> title was give at A
its logically wrong to proove: title ...

Sure I don't get your mean as your English is quite difficult to understand,
can you use Chinese to explain that to us once more?Thank you very much.
By the way, there is no such word spelling as 'proove'.